Hi Ben,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick response. Further comments inline. I deleted sections
that do not appear to need further discussion.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for
--
No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them
together, they make a pretty good raft.
--Anon.
On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:34 AM, C. M. Heard wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Existing routers, which was relying on ID uniqueness of atomic
Sitting in a pub in the Tiergarten metro station, in Berlin, today, I
checked whether there were any open-access wireless points around.
There weren't.
But one of the nets had an SSID of IPV6...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Dave Crocker wrote:
Subject: maybe it's getting real
Sitting in a pub in the Tiergarten metro station, in Berlin, today, I checked
whether there were any open-access wireless points around.
There weren't.
It's very unfortunate not sharing bandwidth is getting real.
C. M. Heard wrote:
Existing routers, which was relying on ID uniqueness of atomic
packets, are now broken when they fragment the atomic packets.
Such routers were always broken. An atomic packet has DF=0 and any
router fragmenting such a packet was and is non-compliant with
the relevant
On 6/3/12 11:13 , Dave Crocker wrote:
Sitting in a pub in the Tiergarten metro station, in Berlin, today, I
checked whether there were any open-access wireless points around.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37107291/ns/technology_and_science-security/
There weren't.
But one of the nets had an
What we have now *is* sclerotic. See Russ' email above yours.
Can we PLEASE eat our own dog food? Wikipedia managed not to melt down when
they decided NOT TO BUILD WALLS so there were no gates for the barbarians to
crush.
Let's just turn on a wiki. Wiki's have a lot of technical measures to
--On Sunday, June 03, 2012 17:40 -0400 Eric Burger
eburge...@standardstrack.com wrote:
What we have now *is* sclerotic. See Russ' email above yours.
Can we PLEASE eat our own dog food? Wikipedia managed not to
melt down when they decided NOT TO BUILD WALLS so there were
no gates for the
On 6/3/12 2:46 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Also, perhaps because I have a more vivid (or paranoid)
imagination than you do, I can think of a lot more than four
individuals who would be inclined to wreck the party.
This, I think, is the show-stopper. Back when the internet started
to become
At 14:33 01-06-2012, Russ Housley wrote:
it in a wiki, there will be more people that can make update, but
the publication process ensure that an end-to-end read takes place
when an update published as an RFC.
Seven individuals (approximate) submitted comments during the Last
Call. That's
--On Sunday, June 03, 2012 14:58 -0800 Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/12 2:46 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Also, perhaps because I have a more vivid (or paranoid)
imagination than you do, I can think of a lot more than four
individuals who would be inclined to wreck the
--On Sunday, June 03, 2012 15:36 -0700 SM s...@resistor.net
wrote:
At 14:33 01-06-2012, Russ Housley wrote:
it in a wiki, there will be more people that can make update,
but the publication process ensure that an end-to-end read
takes place when an update published as an RFC.
Seven
On Jun 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
... I further guess that
on an ongoing basis will be better for the document than
getting a new snapshot out as an RFC and seeing how long it
takes to get stale and how long after that it takes the
community to notice. ...
I second the
Hi John,
At 18:34 03-06-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
I don't think that is a fair comparison. First of all, the Last
Call spawned the whole thread about colloquial language. I
don't have any way to know how many of those who participated in
that thread read all the way through the document and
14 matches
Mail list logo
