Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

Total of 101 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 18 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 17.82% | 18 | 18.44% | 184336 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 6.93% |7 | 4.59% |45869 | abdussa

Re: Last Call: (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard

I have a wording problem with this as below: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:57 AM, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types' >as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans t

Bits-N-Bites Sponsors Needed for Orlando

The IAOC has decided to continue with the Bits-N-Bites event for meeting in 2013. We are seeking sponsors for the Bits-N-Bites event at IETF 86 in Orlando. This is a fairly new community networking event. The first Bits-N-Bites took place at IETF 84 in Vancouver. The second Bits-N-Bites took

Re: Last Call: (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC

> Hi Ned, > On 01/16/2013 03:40 AM, Ned Freed wrote: > >> Actually I think you make a couple of great points that ought be > >> mentioned in the draft about implementability. (No chance you'd > >> have time to craft a paragraph? If not, I'll try pinch text from > >> above:-) Now that you point it

Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing

Absolutely nothing. We're screwed. That's why one has to laugh out loud when we charter a work group to produce a royalty-free version of foo, because there are encumbered versions of foo out there. Unless the people with the rights to foo are participating and have offered their rights as part

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06

Hi Peter, Thanks for your detailed review. An updated version has just been submitted the includes fixes to your comments. Thanks Magnus On 2012-12-26 12:05, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >