S Moonesamy wrote:
At 01:32 30-04-2013, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
I am not sure what you think is unclear. Note that the definition of
the typedef domain-name is unchanged from the one in RFC 6021. Perhaps
you can make a concrete text change proposal so I better understand
what your
MAY != SHOULD
The text is as follows: The name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever
possible. If the working group would like a RFC 2119 SHOULD it
would help if there is an explanation in the sentence for the reader
weigh the implications of not following that.
My knee-jerk reaction is to use
On 5/8/2013 10:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Heather, all,
You are correct, Peter. MISSREF and AUTH48 are not part of the RFC
Editor timed states, and the RFC Editor timed states have been largely
under 7 weeks for the last year.
Indeed. The actual time for what RFC Editor does for documents is
--On Thursday, May 09, 2013 09:28 +0200 Randy Bush
ra...@psg.com wrote:
Similarly, wherever possible is unhelpful; if it's not
possible to fully-qualify a domain name then ambiguity is
guaranteed.
no, that is what SHOLD means. e.g. when i write docco that
has an ops clause where there
--On Thursday, May 09, 2013 03:32 -0500 Spencer Dawkins
spen...@wonderhamster.org wrote:
So in this case, we're looking at RFC Editor state =
Heather, please do something + some working group, please
do something + author(s), please do something, and we can't
tell how much time to attribute
On 10/05/2013 01:13, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Thursday, May 09, 2013 03:32 -0500 Spencer Dawkins
spen...@wonderhamster.org wrote:
So in this case, we're looking at RFC Editor state =
Heather, please do something + some working group, please
do something + author(s), please do something,
Dear ietf, spfbis, and repute,
Until an identifier is linked with the source of an exchange by way of
authentication, it must not be trusted as offering valid reputation input. For
example, a valid DKIM signature lacks important context. A valid DKIM
signature does not depend upon actual
Total of 138 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri May 10 00:53:02 EDT 2013
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
7.25% | 10 | 8.90% |93387 | ma...@isc.org
6.52% |9 | 7.85% |82311 | nar...@us.ibm.com
Greetings
This is to announce a virtual interim meeting for the MMUSIC Working
Group to take place on Thursday, May 23rd, from 7:00 am - 10:00 am
Pacific Time. The goal of this meeting is to come to a resolution on the
so-called Plan A or Plan B approach related to SDP signaling needed
by RTCWeb,
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6923
Title: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Identifiers
Following ITU-T Conventions
Author: R. Winter, E. Gray,
H. van Helvoort, M. Betts
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6937
Title: Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP
Author: M. Mathis,
N. Dukkipati,
Y. Cheng
Status: Experimental
Stream:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6943
Title: Issues in Identifier Comparison for
Security Purposes
Author: D. Thaler, Ed.
Status: Informational
Stream: IAB
12 matches
Mail list logo
