Hi Rui:
The comments were not ignored, the resolution of the Q10 comments as well as
those collected from the MPLS WG was presented at the last IETF. My spreadsheet
from which that report was generated and has been augmented to include the BFD
WG comments is available at
http://www.pi.nu/~loa/
Hi Erminio:
Two of the three document editors were present at SG15 plenary in February
where the comments originated. The revised meeting schedule resulted in a day
spent going through the document with the editors. IMO there were lots of
discussion and legitimate issues with the document ident
Hi Erminio:
>Several service providers regarded this draft as not meeting their
>transport networks' needs.
E> This is a true statement: the solution in this draft is useless for many
MPLS- TP deployments.
The two statements do not necessarily follow.
What we established during discuss
-define it and make it compatible with IP/MPLS. So there was an industry wide
"design intent" implied here.
> IMHO, between your MPLS-TP view and MPLS/IP, it becomes more and more
> difficult to tell which is which.
That is because MPLS-TP is not a new techology, it is an addition to the entire
--Original Message-
From: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:tnad...@lucidvision.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:27 AM
To: neil.2.harri...@bt.com
Cc: rco...@ptinovacao.pt; David Allan I; stbry...@cisco.com; m...@ietf.org;
ietf@ietf.org; ietf-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call:
Hi Neil:
As a result of Adrians AD review, some text to that effect was added to the
Security Considerations section.
Have a good weekend
Dave
-Original Message-
From: neil.2.harri...@bt.com [mailto:neil.2.harri...@bt.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:40 AM
To: David Allan I; tnad
h the history and why some comments were rejected. If you can
suggest a constructive way to proceed that is not simply a waste of everyone's
time, I'll listen..
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: erminio.ottone...@libero.it [mailto:erminio.ottone...@libero.it]
Sent: Wed
I think it is unfortunate that we are in a situation where such a document has
utility. But ultimately it does.
Therefore I support the publication of draft-sprecher...
D
> MPLS Working Group,
>
> Please be aware of the IETF last call as shown below. The document was
> presented for publicat
etc. That cannot
be "fixed" either, but I do not believe in rewarding it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Winter [mailto:rolf.win...@neclab.eu]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 6:39 AM
To: David Allan I; ietf@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call:
