To add to the confusion, and to emphasise the point about making
clear, British and American English differ here. If three
proposals (not the most common case, I agree, but it can happen)
have 45%, 35% and 20% of the votes, the first of these has a
majority, sometimes
but the To Subscribe pointer is busted.
According to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo the list is supposed
to be https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext.
jaap
It is of course all history, but allow me some remarks (in line).
Thanks Brian, That helps clear up a few things. See below for a
couple of questions:
At 8:31 AM + 1/1/13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I'v been hesitating to join in here because this seems distinctly OT
On Nov 1, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
I also offer my signature under the recall procedure, in case
pragmatism doesn't prevail (see my other note).
My offer of signature should in no way be interpreted as
reflecting an opinion about Marshall's character.
I'm looking forward to the normative use of BLINK.../BLINK.
Proper use should be NORMATIVE/NORMATIVE, how that is revealed to
the user is decided by the display system.
jaap
indeed, the following line in your header was the clue.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:10:17 -0700
That is interesting, I didn't had this line in the header. Strange.
jaap
If the idea of not fixing agendas is to remain, then any experiments for
extending the Friday schedule pretty much mean that everyone has to
extend their stay, doesn't it? I think if we want to use Friday time
properly, then this ideology needs to go.
Fully agree. We
If we don't want to hold meetings on Friday afternoons due to conflicts,
I'd much rather see us eliminate one of the plenaries and hold meetings
during that time slot.
I was already planning to bring this up again in the IAB, but now that you
mention it
There's no need to change the current language. RFCs have been referring
to cron jobs since 1997.
Actually since 1991, see below
jaap
% cd ~/library/rfc-editor/in-notes
% grep -w cron *
rfc1244.txt:- Checks all commands in the /etc/rc files and cron
ps. And this evening a newbie told me that he found it very handy that
everybody was wearing a badge, as it allowed him to get the names of
everybody he spoke to.
Not only newbies. I have a virtual memory for names and it is always
paged out. Therefore, I do like the name badges
For some of us traveling a lot, the only available time to get the VISA for
next meeting will be vacations period in the next couple of weeks.
However, I still don't see this being available in the meeting page.
Can we please make sure to provide this in the next couple
On 13 jul 2010, at 7:19, Hasnaa Moustafa wrote:
I understood that the train runs daily from Brussels to Maastricht.
There are more than 10 connections daily. I can't seem to find
the direct Brussels - Maastricht train right now, though, the
best options I see are with
That's the same software. If b-rail.be is competent about
updating its route database with other companies' trains, then
the results will be exactly as good as for bahn.de.
In that case, give ns.nl (dutch railways) a try. They seem to list
during the day a direct train between
OV-chipkaart logo is already seen on some ticket machines, so I would
be glad to get an advice where and how these chipkaarts can be bought
and where it can be used except for train tickets purchase.
Have a look at http://www.ov-chipkaart.nl/?taal=en. Maybe the
iet...@sidn.nl can
think that Minneapolis is incovenient, it's not one hop from San
It is from Amsterdam, the only place worth living anyway.
I like the new long planning for the IETF. Gives people more time for
whining.
jaap
___
Ietf mailing list
The USG has a new program out which requires people to use this for
the Visa Waiver Prgogram and other stuff. I forgot the right URL
and used google to find it back. To my suprise I got various of
hits for various sites offering me to send a pdf-file for $ 49.95
or more telling me how to fill in
For short excerpts, one can use the text anyway and claim fair use,
but larger excerpts can be useful to quote in comments or documentation
and then there is a problem.
This whole line of reasoning does reminds me of stories about camels
jumping through eyse in needles, numbers
Can you share their name ?
Should we start a site listing IPv6 providers ?
Can you find a more appropriate list for this topic?
jaap
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Historical note...
To confirm this:
The introduction of cs caused more general problems, unrelated
to name ordering, because there were systems all over the
network in computer science departments with FQDNs like
host.cs.someuniversity.edu. It was common in many of
BTW - I have no knowledge of the venue, I've never been to Ireland.
I'm reacting to seeing these complaints pile up over the years about
nearly everywhere we have been.
I remember staying in Rathcoole about 35 years ago. It was a lovely
rural place. I came back to stay there
So the question is how to document the
assessment that lots of people do use IMAP.
Start to ask oufits like https://www.imap4all.com/ but what is the
poinmt of this discussion anyway?
jaap
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
(Someone said)
Lets do the experiment, but lets not run it in prime time until we know
how it will impact productivity.
Note that the experiment has been done already a couple of times. At a
couple of IETF meetings the IPv4 connections went down, but I could
connect back home with IPv6.
There are two major reasons for an organization to not want roaming
users to trust locally-assigned DNS servers.
Open recursive servers doesn't help in against man in the middle
attacks. If you want to avoid that use VPN's or (for DNS) TSIG.
I seem to remember that the ID actually
Harald, Ben has pointed out one important use for something like
1345, which involves references to characters in programming
languages and command interfaces. The Unicode names are bad
news for that, I certainly don't want
I wouldn't be suprised if that was the case. There
--On mandag, oktober 03, 2005 09:53:06 +0200 Brian E Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
http://www.neustar.com/pressroom/files/announcements/ns_pr_09282005.pdf
Comments welcome. Is it to be understood as an alt-root? or is it a
But, having travelled in and out of France for the last decade+ I can
categorically state that this has NEVER happened to me nor anyone I
know of/have heard of.
Neither have I. Nor have crypto laws seem a problem taking a lap top
over US borders.
So, trying to get an IETF
Real serious issues seem to be waved away. To my opinion, one
threat to the international nature of the IETF are the continuous
increasing difficulties entering the US. This morning I read in the
local papers that starting the 25th of october the Visa-Waiver
program
May be IDN specialists will want to comment this.
http://www.shmoo.com/idn/homograph.txt
This is nothing new, analog to YAHOO.COM and YAH00.COM.
jaap
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Hi John,
--On Tuesday, 08 February, 2005 13:41 +0100 Jaap Akkerhuis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be IDN specialists will want to comment this.
http://www.shmoo.com/idn/homograph.txt
This is nothing new, analog to YAHOO.COM and YAH00.COM
What are your thoughts?
RFC 2821 obsoletes 821, 974, 1869 and updates 1123. Maybe you find some
answers there?
jaap
Jeffrey,
Governments and ccTLDs: A Global Survey at
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/geistgovernmentcctlds.pdf
Column at http://shorl.com/fastokobruhako [Toronto Star]
Think Web's virtually government free? Think again
MICHAEL GEIST
LAW BYTES
This study is seems flawed.
have we figures about the frequency of changes in the root file?
The serial # changes twice a day. The contents hardly as far as I
can see.
Always wanted to check that, but since it is of interest on a
substantial duration never did.
It is very easy to check. Just pull over the
While parallel issues start being discussed and better understood at WSIS,
we have next week a meeting on Internet national security, sovereignty and
innovation capacity.
Who is we in above paragraph?
jaap
So the question boils down to: Are they owners of .com, or merely
caretakers?
An excellent question! But that is a discussion that belongs with
ICANN, not the IETF.
Nearly my reaction as well. Note, using the concept of ownership
has/will get quite some
Mass Delusion is just that. Witness the 69/8 debacle.
During this discussion I've seen references to the 69/8 debacle.
Can anybody explain what the debacle is/was? Is this a magic phrase
for real insiders? Is is something that happened only on a local
net? If not, why don't you
This message from Randy Bush to DNSOP is hugely inappropriate.
It isn't. He just mentions:
(r) i will send you each a bona fide You Are Right certificate if you
(r) will both shut the hell up. you are one message from my .procmailrc.
-- (r) dean is a long-time entry.
Note that there is for quite some time a RIPE WG which is looking
into spam issues. See https://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/anti-spam/index.html
for details.
jaap
37 matches
Mail list logo
