Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Why the IETF? Why not ISOC, an organization that has expertise and
> experience is asking such questions? ISOC already has local chapters
> throughout the world, ISOC has a friendly membership policy, and ISOC
> has good relations with the IETF for discussing proposed improve
Dear colleagues,
This is a reminder that the nomination period closes 9-January-08, 23:59
hours (UTC).
Please make sure you submit nominations by the deadline.
Best regards,
Patrick Vande Walle, Chair
ISOC 2008 Nominations Committee
he Northern hemisphere is automatically fine for the rest of the world
seems slightly colonialist to me.
Best,
Patrick Vande Walle
ISOC Luxembourg
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Joel M. Halpern said the following on 15/07/2006 17:13:
That does not match the report I received from another attendee.
He commented on
2 days of travel to get there,
... but 2 hours from Europe ...
multiple 1 hour plus outages of external connectivity
I did not, once I switche
ble design is CoDNS
(http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/egs/beehive/codons.php).
Patrick Vande Walle
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
ill
endorse their records based on price, service and functionality."
Patrick Vande Walle
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Brian E Carpenter wrote, On 29/11/2006 10:43:
> your question is linked to whether we treat the namespace as a public
> good to be administered for the greater public good, or as a
> commodity to be treated like coffee beans. And that really isn't
> a question for this technological community.
Depe
e a
lot of home devices connected to the Internet on his home network in a
few years from now, and this may require some segmentation, which a /64
does not provide. Actually, I hope my neighbour will never have to know
about these details, and that his home router will figure this out
automatically.
