?
On the contrary, I get calls from a new VC-backed startup touting
exactly that type of scheme roughly every three months.
I hope you told them to give the money back.
--
Paul Robinson
http://vagueware.com
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
easy to break, and too easy to ignore.
--
Paul Robinson
http://vagueware.com
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
confronting me on a daily basis than I did
6 months ago. My spam folder has grown considerably, but my inbox is relatively
clean. The problem is, the techniques I've used to make that so are beyond most
users, and it would seem, most ISPs.
--
Paul Robinson
that we hoped so much for, into more widely adopted
protocols. In effect, an advert for some work from the WGs.
Thoughts welcome, particularly if the consensus is these talks would be a
Bad Idea(tm).
--
Paul Robinson
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:36:07AM +, Paul Robinson wrote:
Are you suggesting then, that all RFCs based on IPv6 should be... stopped?
That's what happens when you write e-mails and then don't check them before
sending them...
s/IPv6/IPv4 - obviously. :-)
--
Paul Robinson
, and supporting IPv4 once more due to customer
pressures. :-)
--
Paul Robinson
hosting servers near the core of the network,
who get it when they ask for it, which is what we mostly have now.
I'm not advocating re-drafts where we stick IPv6 Requirements into
everything in sight, however. :-)
--
Paul Robinson
working?
And out of curiosity, how many people here have migrated their entire network to IPv6 already to set a good example and show how it's done? Yes, thought so.
--
Paul Robinson
are turning this into a wiki crikey.
--
Paul Robinson
it to some people I know who have
studied and research information theory and see if they have any input.
I look forward to your response,
--
Paul Robinson
, if at all, through
a restrictive, address-and-protocol-translating gateway. We
No, no, no, NO. To allow this would to happen would be a genuine shame.
How popular is Internet2? Why? I rest my case...
--
Paul Robinson
a great idea if we're going to link it all to performance related pay... :-)
--
Paul Robinson
yet though. :-)
Seriously... ascii art... hehehe...
--
Paul Robinson
On Mar 19, D. J. Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Robinson writes:
Something *should* be done, but your argument has a hint of
'I never want anything done, ever' about it, which is putting people off.
I have put a huge amount of effort into evaluating the costs of various
IDN
that might ever have to
deal with IDNs capable of handling UTF-8?
If you were IT director of a large firm, and you had a choice as to which to
roll out, which would you choose?
--
Paul Robinson
.
H... :-)
--
Paul Robinson
the corporates, it's about trying to
create a level playing field. I, for one, completely agree with adopting a
tiering system.
--
Paul Robinson
?
There's too much blue in it, and its skewed to the left a little. :-)
--
Paul Robinson
.
--
Paul Robinson
participants crawled
under a rock and never showed any further interest in the IETF, many people
would break open the champagne. Shame really. Ho-hum.
--
Paul Robinson
meeting.
--
Paul Robinson
should be done about it apart from telling the WG to drop everything and
listen to you?
--
Paul Robinson
to check who your
mail is going to next time before you sent it.
--
Paul Robinson
it:
Registrant:
ABA.net Internet Services
Apt 313
15 Albert Avenue
Broadbeach
Surfers Paradise, Queensland 4218
AU
Domain Name: YOURNAME.COM
--
Paul Robinson
finale,
we can take control of the machine and do what we wanted anyway.
Eventually, we as the IETF would have complete control of every machine
connected to the Internet, thereby giving us control of the entire
planet, which in turn would allow us to park wherever we wanted and
*not*get*a*ticket*
(if
you're not aware already) that opening the attatchment is a Bad
Thing(tm) if you're using anything that can understand VBScript
(like Windows for example... :-) )
--
Paul Robinson - Developer/Sys Admin @ Akitanet http://www.akit
26 matches
Mail list logo
