Re: Requirement to go to meetings

2011-10-25 Thread Ping Pan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.comwrote: On 10/24/2011 10:17 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: The biggest challenge is however that we are seeing a massive increase in Bar-BOFs... it's one thing if 5 people get together to figure out a problem statement,

Re: Requirement to go to meetings

2011-10-23 Thread Ping Pan
In the past three IETF meetings, I have traveled to Beijing, Prague and Quebec City to meet most who live within a few hours (air, car, walking etc.) from me. The next two will be in Taipei (in Winter) and Paris (in Spring). This is more like a vacation package than a get-together for engineers to

Re: China blocking Wired?

2010-01-12 Thread Ping Pan
Yeap, getting in/out China is pretty easy and fast. I once had to be in Beijing for family emergency reason, and got the visa in Beijing airport. Paid a little more, but it was pretty smooth. The airport search is no more than what we have here in US. Everything is OK. Nobody is going to bite.

RE: Deployment Cases

2008-01-02 Thread Ping Pan
-Original Message- From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:32 AM To: Tony Finch Cc: Ping Pan; 'IETF discussion list' Subject: Re: Deployment Cases Tony Finch wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Ping Pan wrote: Another place that needs some serious help

RE: Deployment Cases

2008-01-01 Thread Ping Pan
-Original Message- From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 11:45 AM From outside IETF: XMPP iSCSI MPLS Dave, MPLS is an IP technology that has been largely driven inside IETF. Millions of users have benefited from the backbones

RE: Deployment Cases

2008-01-01 Thread Ping Pan
regards, - Ping _ From: Franck Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:09 PM To: Ping Pan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'IETF discussion list' Subject: Re: Deployment Cases Isn't it the role of the IRTF/IAB/? to look at which areas should the IETF put more

RE: hop-by-hop and router alert options [Re: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks]

2004-08-12 Thread Ping Pan
Pekka, I really really hope that there has been a problem statement... Here is an old draft on RSVP issues: http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~pingpan/papers/draft-pan-nsis-rsvp-transpor t-01.txt Further point where you can use path-coupled signalling, you mean? Not really, as there seems

RE: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks

2004-08-11 Thread Ping Pan
Do you count for RSVP-TE, that has been deployed widely in carrier networks? Other than multicast and wild-card filtering, all other features (and more) defined in the context of RSVP have been developed and deployed. The number of RSVP sessions (a.k.a. MPLS LSP's) is in the range of thousands in

RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard

2003-03-11 Thread Ping Pan
Please ask your customers on which method they prefer. Both methods and all three path identification have been developed and deployed. We are only describing how protocols suppose to work, not mandating customer requirements. If you have questions on protocol detail issues, please forward them

RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard

2003-03-11 Thread Ping Pan
Please ask your customers on which method they prefer. Both methods and all three path identification have been developed and deployed. We are only describing how protocols suppose to work, not mandating customer requirements. I am not sure I agree with you. IESG has repeatedly

Re: network simulation software?

2001-03-23 Thread Ping Pan
in advance. -Wang Hui. -- Ping Pan