Hi,
I think that despite if the people are working with company money or
their own they should be able to estimate if they can have enough time
to spend on the effort.
Also they should have an easy way out when they notice that e.g. for a
change in their lives they cannot commit that much time
Henning and Spencer,
first of all I think Henning's idea is a nice one. I think that there
should be some kind of a way to both get rid of chairs that are in the
way of progress in a humane manner and they do not understand it
themselves. However, I think (or at least hope) these kind of people
Hi,
I agree with Joel. Though, the metric is simple (and in that regard
possibly good to track) I believe it measures the wrong thing. I think
that if the WG does work and there is no need for drawing conclusions on
the WG mailing list, or the WG chair has chosen not to contribute
technically -
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:16, ext Scott W Brim wrote:
On 1/7/2005 10:56, Harald Tveit Alvestrand allegedly wrote:
I think this line of thought has died down without any great
disagreement the consensus seems to be that the following sentence:
The IAOC members shall not receive any
Harald,
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 10:28, ext Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 3. januar 2005 07:40 -0800 EKR ekr@rtfm.com wrote:
I don't think that anyone is saying that. However, AFAIK there's
in fact no rule prohibiting IESG/IAB members from being directly
paid by IETF--not that that's a
Brian,
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 12:24, ext Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Jonne,
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:
Hi,
sorry to tune in late, but keeping up with all the mails that are going
around I needed a vacation at the place of my in-laws...
I think the issue of a yearly
:
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I admit that I maybe have too much a view point of someone
working for a relatively large company. I try to approach
this from a position where the IAOC itself does not become a
significant cost for IASA.
However
Bert,
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 16:46, ext Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Scott reponds to Jonne:
Jonne asks:
would
x.x Compensation for IOAC members
The IOAC members shall not receive any compensation (apart from
reimbursement of expenses) for their services as members
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 17:10, ext Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Scott Bradner wrote:
bert asks:
The current text in section 3, 1st para states
The IAOC consists of volunteers,
does that not say enough?
I'd say no - volunteers can get paid in some cases
x.x Compensation
, 2004-12-31 at 02:39, ext Sam Hartman wrote:
Soininen == Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Soininen x.x IAOC members compensation for labor, travel, and
Soininen other costs
Soininen The IAOC membership is considered voluntary. Hence
Scott,
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 15:18, ext Scott Bradner wrote:
Personally, I don't understand why we would have a different
reimbursement policy for IAOC members than for IESG and IAB members.
just being willing to pay travel expenses might make it possible for
someone to be able to do
Hi,
sorry to tune in late, but keeping up with all the mails that are going
around I needed a vacation at the place of my in-laws...
I think the issue of a yearly audit has been solved already in the past
(Issue 721). However, I think that there is no mention of a special
audit outside the
Hi,
I think one of the things still missing from the document is setting of
the compensation for the IAOC members for their services, travel, etc. I
think that everybody expects the job to be voluntary and that's why it
has not been documented. However, for the sake of avoiding future
discussions
invested to the IAOC work.
I think what I have proposed is in line with the current practice in
IAB/IESG as well, for instance.
Cheers,
Jonne.
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:10, ext EKR wrote:
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think one of the things still missing from
by-laws...
Cheers,
Jonne.
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:30, ext EKR wrote:
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if we decide to reimburse for the expenses created by the position in
the IAOC we have to create also rules what is reimbursed and on what
terms. E.g., in what
Scott,
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:14, ext Scott Bradner wrote:
thanks to Jonne for bringing this up - I agree that some text about this
should be in the document but I disagree on what it should say.
imo - the IAOC members should not be compensated for their time but
I think its reasonable
Hello everybody,
though, I have been silent mostly throughout the discussion on the
mailing list (playing mostly catch up with all of you on the mailing
list), I do have an opinion.
First of all, I would like to state my respect for everybody writing
documents and doing the ground work for us
Hello everybody,
I think before proceeding with hiring a person we should have a bit more
discussion on the responsibilities and tasks for the admin director. I
think Carl's proposal is a good first cut on these. However, it is just
that.
On the actual proposal, I was wondering if the current
18 matches
Mail list logo
