Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC

2009-12-11 Thread Georgios Karagiannis
anks, >Jerry > > >--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Georgios Karagiannis wrote: > > >From: Georgios Karagiannis >Subject: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter -- Re: Last Call: >draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC >To: "Gerald Ash" , &qu

Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC

2009-12-11 Thread Gerald Ash
wrote: From: Georgios Karagiannis Subject: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC To: "Gerald Ash" , "IETF-Announce" , "ietf@ietf.org" , "n...@ietf.org" Date: Tue

[NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC

2009-12-08 Thread Georgios Karagiannis
Hi Jerry I think that the reason of removing the "Maximum Packet Size [M] (32-bit unsigned integer)" parameter from the QSPEC specification was that this parameter is only relevant for some QoS models that are used on an end-to-end basis, such as Y.1541 QOSM. I would therefore prefer that this pa