Sam Hartman wrote:
Jiankang == Jiankang YAO ya...@cnnic.cn writes:
Jiankang If there are many things we must do, we(WGs) normally
Jiankang prioritize the things. sometimes, the easier one first;
Jiankang sometimes, the difficult one first.
Sure.
That's fine for the WG to
Alexey == Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com writes:
Alexey Sam Hartman wrote:
Jiankang == Jiankang YAO ya...@cnnic.cn writes:
Jiankang If there are many things we must do, we(WGs) normally
Jiankang prioritize the things. sometimes, the easier one first;
Jiankang == Jiankang YAO ya...@cnnic.cn writes:
Jiankang If there are many things we must do, we(WGs) normally
Jiankang prioritize the things. sometimes, the easier one first;
Jiankang sometimes, the difficult one first.
Sure.
That's fine for the WG to do.
I don't think it is good
Peter == Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im writes:
Peter On 5/19/10 12:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've
brought up in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph
Peter I proposed:
PeterAlthough the group
On 5/19/10 12:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up
in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a
significant step backward. I would object to chartering the group with
that paragraph added without explicitly
On 5/18/10 12:32 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
Le 10-05-18 14:27, Sam Hartman a écrit :
Marc == Marc Blanchetmarc.blanc...@viagenie.ca writes:
Marc we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we
Marc restrict the scope to a specific set of documents to
Marc
we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we restrict the
scope to a specific set of documents to review/update/... or do we keep
some provision for other documents coming in the stream that require
help of the newprep. I was arguing for the latter. To me, what you are
talking
Le 10-05-19 09:40, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 5/18/10 12:32 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
Le 10-05-18 14:27, Sam Hartman a écrit :
Marc == Marc Blanchetmarc.blanc...@viagenie.ca writes:
Marc we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we
Marc restrict the scope
On May 19, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
We're trying to balance two things here: (1) we want to get as much
input as possible from current and potential customers of stringprep or
newprep/stringprepbis/whatever, but (2) we want to scope the WG tightly
enough that it doesn't
Hi Mark,
Mark Lentczner wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
[...]
In an email exchange with Marc and Alexey Melnikov last week, I proposed
adding ...
Although the group will seek input from and may provide advice to
customers working on other technologies, it
I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up
in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a
significant step backward. I would object to chartering the group with
that paragraph added without explicitly listing any use cases including
the onse I brought
Marc == Marc Blanchet marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca writes:
Marc we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we
Marc restrict the scope to a specific set of documents to
Marc review/update/... or do we keep some provision for other
Marc documents coming in the stream that
12 matches
Mail list logo
