On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:28:37 EDT, Michael Richardson said:
> Even if they do not result in efficiencies in the routing table, I
> think they would go a long way to making people happy.
If you want to make people happy by promising technically infeasible solutions,
I suggest a career in politics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> "Nathaniel" == Nathaniel Borenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nathaniel> Christian -- Your mesage seems to presume rather
Nathaniel> optimistically that there can be a workable technical
Nathaniel> alternative to central registries. If not -
Christian -- Your mesage seems to presume rather optimistically that
there can be a workable technical alternative to central registries.
If not -- and I'm skeptical -- your "stop digging" advice might
translate into "stop improving the net."
At the very least, it's an open question whether it
"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" wrote:
[..]
> - We need a multilingual multinational root matrix.
instead I think we're going to be getting a root canal.
gja
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
At 23:52 16/07/04, Paul Vixie wrote:
One way of reading these tea leaves is to say that ICANN hasn't been seen as
truly open, truly inclusive, or truly independent. "Lapdog of the US-DoC"
was one critic's description. Speaking as an early adopter of Vint's and
Jon's philosophy of openness/inclusi
Paul, this IPv9 hoopla strikes me as another research project harping
the nationalistic chord in order to get funding. This is not exactly
news. It was a common undertone in many European research proposals in
the 1980's and 1990's, and it is also a classic line in NSF or DARPA
proposals. The offic
> ... Why doesn't this group join hand to insure full exploitation of IPv6?
based on http://www.chinatechnews.com/index.php?action=show&type=news&id=1405,
i'd say that the answer to that question is implied by the following quote:
China and the United States are currently the only two cou
At 17:48 06/07/04, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tony Hain" writes:
>Sitting here in Seoul, Janet Sun (BII) said this is self-promotion of a
>single researcher looking to improve his funding. There is technical
>content, but no business content and the service providers
ECTED]
> Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:37 PM
> To: Tony Hain
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Bill Manning'
> Subject: Re: Chinese IPv9
>
>
> Tony Hain wrote:
>
> > There is technical
> > content, but no business
Tony Hain wrote:
> There is technical
> content, but no business content and the service providers are ignoring it
> as a waste of time.
So, it's almost identical to IPv6.
Masataka Ohta
___
Iet
> From: "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is technical content, but no business content and the service
> providers are ignoring it as a waste of time.
I think we still have many areas within IPv6 that need more researches and
concentration. Why doesn't this group join hand to insure full e
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Chinese IPv9
% Complete compilation of news at http://www.ist-
ipv6.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=622
%
% But I guess is an hoax ?
%
the site seems to be missing some of the chinese language
repo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tony Hain" writes:
>Sitting here in Seoul, Janet Sun (BII) said this is self-promotion of a
>single researcher looking to improve his funding. There is technical
>content, but no business content and the service providers are ignoring it
>as a waste of time. Think o
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Chinese IPv9
% Complete compilation of news at http://www.ist-
ipv6.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=622
%
% But I guess is an hoax ?
%
the site seems to be missing some of the chinese language
repo
> From: "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is technical content, but no business content and the service
> providers are ignoring it as a waste of time.
Sounds like an apt description for some other IPvN efforts... :-)
Noel
__
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Manning
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Chinese IPv9
>
> % Complete compilation of news at http://www.ist-
> ipv6.o
% Complete compilation of news at
http://www.ist-ipv6.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=622
%
% But I guess is an hoax ?
%
the site seems to be missing some of the chinese language
reports... :)
and based on (imho) more informed sources, this is not a
riginal Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:05 PM
> Subject: RE: Chinese IPv9
>
>
> > See also:
> >
> > http://www.chinatechnews.com/index.php?action=show&type=news&id
Complete compilation of news at
http://www.ist-ipv6.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=622
But I guess is an hoax ?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: RE: C
July 05, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Chinese IPv9
Hi,
a german computer magazine reported that China
is developing their own IP address scheme as
IPv9 ( http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/48859 )
in order to improve "security" (probably spelled: censorship
Hi,
a german computer magazine reported that China
is developing their own IP address scheme as
IPv9 ( http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/48859 )
in order to improve "security" (probably spelled: censorship).
They cite
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-07/05/content_1572719.htm
It is to
21 matches
Mail list logo
