To: Rohan Mahy; Brian Rosen; Hannes Tschofenig; General Area
Review Team
Cc: Cullen Jennings; IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen
; IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
Ben wrote:
There's a few ways to handle that:
1) Treat rate-control as an informative reference, and say you're doing
something mostly like rate control, but not quite identical. That would
require quite a bit more normative language
; salvatore.lor...@ericsson.com;
Cullen Jennings; Rohan Mahy; IETF-Discussion list; General
Area Review Team; Hannes Tschofenig
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
Ben wrote:
There's a few
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
So, the rate control does recognize that the first notify message can be
empty or might not contain all state:
$3.2: Thus, the first notification might be empty, or certain values might
be absent.
The text that was originally
Ben wrote:
There's a few ways to handle that:
1) Treat rate-control as an informative reference, and say you're doing
something mostly like rate control, but not quite identical. That would
require quite a bit more normative language to describe what you're actually
doing.
2) Make this
; Hannes Tschofenig
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
Ben wrote:
There's a few ways to handle that:
1) Treat rate-control as an informative reference, and say
you're doing something mostly like rate
Ben wrote:
I was not under the impression from reading rate-control that that document
was modifying 3265 to prevent notifiers from sending an empty notify. But,
your suggestion is a reasonable one. Reading the rate-control text you
quoted earlier in the thread could lead to the
); aki.ni...@nokia.com;
krisztian.k...@nokia.com; salvatore.lor...@ericsson.com;
Cullen Jennings; Rohan Mahy; IETF-Discussion list; General
Area Review Team; Hannes Tschofenig
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Thomson
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
10 matches
Mail list logo
