-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
(4) Others (probably a partially overlapping group with (3))
just find more rules
On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
(4) Others (probably a partially
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
(4) Others (probably a partially overlapping group with (3))
just find more rules
--On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:34 -0700
ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
(4
--On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:34 -0700
ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
--On Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:38 -0700 Murray S. Kucherawy
m...@cloudmark.com wrote:
...
I don't know if there is a need for template changes or
some formal section in the write up, but it would seem to me
that an author who has reached a level of getting WG assigned
...
OK, now I
On 2011-08-04 16:12, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill McQuillan
[mcqui...@pobox.com]
Perhaps it could be included in the ID-Announce message.
In a lot of situations, the I-D submission tool knows the name of the relevant
On 8/5/2011 1:45 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
In my experience, many ID authors actually forget to consider where to send
feedback. Thus making this something to be checked upon ID submission (maybe
with a way to opt-out) might be helpful.
+1
When something is a routine expectation it is
On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include information
about the existence of a Working Group, if any, and/or discussion
group list address, if any, for to join and participate in the
development of the I-D or simply to follow it.
I
On 2011-08-04 09:11, Bill McQuillan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include information
about the existence of a Working Group, if any, and/or discussion
group list address, if any, for to join and participate in the
development
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
I think I have read some I-D that including this useful information,
but most do not. Its one the first things I look for.
Just a thought if it makes sense.
+100
Perhaps it could be included in the ID-Announce message.
04.08.2011 12:04, Peter Koch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
I think I have read some I-D that including this useful information,
but most do not. Its one the first things I look for.
Just a thought if it makes sense.
+100
Perhaps it could be included
--On Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:36 +0200 Julian Reschke
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-08-04 09:11, Bill McQuillan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
On 8/4/2011 6:47 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
This should be mandatory in IDs.
...
But there are circumstances in which the appropriate mailing
list is not known at the time of posting and others in which
permission to use an obvious mailing list requires pre-approval
that might significantly
From: Hector Santos
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
and/or discussion group list address, if any, for to join
and participate in the development of the I-D or simply to
follow it.
We already have
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill
McQuillan [mcqui...@pobox.com]
Perhaps it could be included in the ID-Announce message.
In a lot of situations, the I-D submission tool knows the name of the relevant
working group
and could include its mailing list
On 2011-08-04 16:11, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: Hector Santos
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
and/or discussion group list address, if any, for to join
and participate in the development of the I-D or
On 8/4/2011 7:11 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Once one knows the WG name,
And when there is no working group that the document is associated with?
In addition, there is a certain degree of exclusionary culture that comes with a
requirement that a new reader know how to derive a
I don't know if there is a need for template changes or some formal
section in the write up, but it would seem to me that an author who
has reached a level of getting WG assigned and/or even started a
mailing list (IETF or otherwise) would be very eager to announce it in
a new I-D (01?)
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter
Koch
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:04 AM
To: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
I-D announcements are already copied to the relevant WG for WG drafts
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hector Santos
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:10 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
I don't know if there is a need for template
AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
I don't know if there is a need for template changes or some formal
section in the write up, but it would seem to me that an author who
has reached a level of getting WG assigned and/or even started a
mailing
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include information
about the existence of a Working Group, if any, and/or discussion
group list address, if any, for to join and participate in the
development of the I-D or simply to follow it.
I think I have read some I-D that including this
23 matches
Mail list logo
