As a life-long fan of the Gong Show, I think it'd be cool to have a big
Gong on the dias, where perhaps after a bunch of loud hums, an AD or IAB
member finally satisfies the audience. This could happen sooner or
later, depending on whether we're talking about topic (1) NATs, (2)
The standards
In fact, lightning talks are SOP at most operator group meetings.
I think that would be an excellent experiment.
Brian
On 2009-11-17 22:39, Eliot Lear wrote:
As a life-long fan of the Gong Show, I think it'd be cool to have a big
Gong on the dias, where perhaps after a bunch of loud hums,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, lightning talks are SOP at most operator group meetings.
I think that would be an excellent experiment.
Brian
I agree, and in fact I've suggested lightning talks too; I think it tilts
We have a hard time getting someone to go the minutes. I'd be
pleased to do jabber if there was a volunteer for the typing.
Russ
At 04:47 AM 11/13/2009, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
My understanding is that these days, most WG and BOF meetings have
somebody watching jabber and bringing up comments
Olaf Kolkman wrote:
During previous technical sessions I mailed an announcement about the technical
plenary and in those announcements I've asked something along the lines of:
If you consider asking a question during the open-microphone session it
would be helpful to send that question to
Reaction to the timers was quite mixed, going all the way from love
to hate; we never did a survey of the participants afterwards, I
think. We probably should have.
I was one of the folks who hated it. I view the open mikes as the
time for the community to speak to the leadership
On 2009-11-17 09:12, Bob Hinden wrote:
Reaction to the timers was quite mixed, going all the way from love to
hate; we never did a survey of the participants afterwards, I think.
We probably should have.
I was one of the folks who hated it. I view the open mikes as the
time for the
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I agree that the I* should listen to the community, but then the
community
should regulate itself. Maybe we need a new tradition - something
like a
polite hum when someone has been ranting for long enough, and a loud
hum
when they have
On Nov 16, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
I can think of a few people who I think have been
ranting too long as soon as they step up to the
mike. So, I think it's probably a mistake to turn
plenaries into a techie version of The Gong Show -
we shouldn't be making it easier to silence
At Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:56:45 -0500,
Russ Housley wrote:
I did not take the comment as disrespectful. A timer might be a very
good experiment.
And indeed used to be common practice.
-Ekr
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
My understanding is that these days, most WG and BOF meetings have
somebody watching jabber and bringing up comments from there to the mic.
Also, jabber scribing seems to be quite popular, complementing the audio
channel (which this time, as reported elsewhere, was excellent).
What about
Martin J. Dürst a écrit :
My understanding is that these days, most WG and BOF meetings have
somebody watching jabber and bringing up comments from there to the
mic. Also, jabber scribing seems to be quite popular, complementing
the audio channel (which this time, as reported elsewhere, was
FWIW, this source is my hacked up version of the original that commented out a
bunch of stuff I don't need when I use this. YMMV. (And thanks to the guys who
originally put this together! It's been helpful many times.)
Lars
On 2009-11-11, at 18:46, Scott Brim wrote:
Tony Hansen allegedly
Russ, Olaf, et al,
I was serious in my recommendation to experiment with limiting
question (comment) time at the microphone at plenaries. I believe
it'll not only help mere mortals pay more attention, but will also
encourage those folks that have questions or comments to be more
concise, thereby
+1
Stephan
On 11/11/09 7:53 PM, Danny McPherson da...@tcb.net wrote:
Russ, Olaf, et al,
I was serious in my recommendation to experiment with limiting
question (comment) time at the microphone at plenaries. I believe
it'll not only help mere mortals pay more attention, but will also
I did not take the comment as disrespectful. A timer might be a very
good experiment.
Russ
At 05:53 AM 11/11/2009, Danny McPherson wrote:
Russ, Olaf, et al,
I was serious in my recommendation to experiment with limiting
question (comment) time at the microphone at plenaries. I believe
Individuals taking a long time to talk either on the mike or responding
on the stage :-) is one problem.
At times I wonder if a bigger issue is how long certain topics are
discussed. I'm sorry but I just can't get excited about labeling of
standards track RFCs, or even about how to get early
Didn't Harald put up a timer sometimes during open mike?
Tony Hansen
Russ Housley wrote:
I did not take the comment as disrespectful. A timer might be a very
good experiment.
Russ
At 05:53 AM 11/11/2009, Danny McPherson wrote:
Russ, Olaf, et al,
I was serious in my recommendation
Hansen t...@att.com
To: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
Didn't Harald put up a timer sometimes during open mike?
Tony Hansen
Russ Housley wrote:
I did not take the comment as disrespectful. A timer might be a very
Tony Hansen allegedly wrote on 11/12/2009 11:11 AM:
Didn't Harald put up a timer sometimes during open mike?
See attached ...
Title: Discussion Timer
TimeRemaining
0:00
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
During previous technical sessions I mailed an announcement about the technical
plenary and in those announcements I've asked something along the lines of:
If you consider asking a question during the open-microphone session it
would be helpful to send that question to the IABi...@iab.org in
21 matches
Mail list logo
