Eric == Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric Well, the difference is in part the IESG note. More
Eric importantly, the question is whether the IESG intends to
Eric hold future work to the requirements in this document. If
Eric they do, then this document needs
On a thread about a specific document that is proposed to be an
Informational RFC coming through the IETF process:
At 1:12 PM -0400 8/20/07, Sam Hartman wrote:
I've asked the sponsoring AD to make a
consensus call on whether we have sufficient support to be making this
sort of statement. If
Paul Hoffman wrote:
On a thread about a specific document that is proposed to be an
Informational RFC coming through the IETF process:
At 1:12 PM -0400 8/20/07, Sam Hartman wrote:
I've asked the sponsoring AD to make a
consensus call on whether we have sufficient support to be making this
Paul == Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul On a thread about a specific document that is proposed to be
Paul an Informational RFC coming through the IETF process:
Paul At 1:12 PM -0400 8/20/07, Sam Hartman wrote:
I've asked the sponsoring AD to make a consensus call on
At Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:09:09 -0400,
Sam Hartman wrote:
Paul == Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul On a thread about a specific document that is proposed to be
Paul an Informational RFC coming through the IETF process:
Paul At 1:12 PM -0400 8/20/07, Sam Hartman
