On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:38:00PM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
1. Permanently and irrevocably ban postings from any and all addresses
that Dean controls. An organized attack warrants it.
2. Highten strictures on ietf list posting. I'm not entirely clear
what level the current bar is
And once the moderate switch has been thrown, what criteria will be
used to decide which messages to allow and which to block?
On 2/11/09, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:38:00PM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
1. Permanently and irrevocably ban postings from any and
Excerpts from Cullen Jennings on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 09:40:55AM -0700:
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
Dean's mail does not hurt any of us. OK, it does take a minute of
our time to unsubscribe but that's it.
In my opinion it is not alright for someone to harvest email address
Scott Brim wrote:
I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
all interactions?
Scott,
When someone demonstrates a permanent pattern of disruptive behavior, with no
counter-balancing pattern of useful contribution, their presence is purely a
distraction.
On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:23 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:20:22PM -0500, Scott Brim wrote:
Dean's mail does not hurt any of us. OK, it does take a minute of
our
time to unsubscribe but that's it. The ietf list will see the same
Spam behaviour on the Internet is
Scott Brim wrote:
Excerpts from Cullen Jennings on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 09:40:55AM -0700:
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
Dean's mail does not hurt any of us. OK, it does take a minute of
our time to unsubscribe but that's it.
In my opinion it is not alright for
Excerpts from Dave CROCKER on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 09:25:14AM -0800:
Scott Brim wrote:
I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
all interactions?
When someone demonstrates a permanent pattern of disruptive behavior,
with no counter-balancing pattern of useful
I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
all interactions?
In Dean's case, yes.
There's a great deal of history here.
R's,
John
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Folks,
The enclosed comes from iadl.org which is controlled by av8.com which is
controlled by Dean Anderson.
Normally, I advocate entirely ignoring silliness, but the current version of it
is more than silly.
This action by Dean is not merely posting inappropriate notes that would warrant
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:38:00 -0800 Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
...
Since we happen to simultaneously be suffering a DOS attack on the list
from a
separately-concerned community,
...
I think an accusation that the FSF is conducting a DOS attack on the IETF
is very serious.
If you
Dave: I disagree ...
Dean's mail does not hurt any of us. OK, it does take a minute of our
time to unsubscribe but that's it. The ietf list will see the same
messages it has already been seeing; his list will carry a few other
messages for people who choose to use it. Messages sent to his list
11 matches
Mail list logo
