James M Snell wrote:
My apologies for not getting back to this sooner.
No problem, it's only that the proposal to rename
the draft attracted my attention, and after I said
that this is dubious in a Last Call thread I read
the text, not only the file name... ;-)
All I know about BiDi issues
I have had a number of conversations with i18n experts on the topic and
none have complained about it thus far... which, of course, doesn't mean
that much. I would very much appreciate having folks like Harald,
Martin and Tex weigh in on the issue.
Another comment that has come up is a
My apologies for not getting back to this sooner. Comments below.
Frank Ellermann wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
If another version of the draft is needed based on
last-call comments, I can make the name change then.
Leave it alone, please. Various tools have problems
with tracking
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:04:24PM +0200,
Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
I don't find dir= in the HTML 4.01 spec.,
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.2
8.2.2 Inheritance of text direction information
...
When the dir attribute
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
I don't find dir= in the HTML 4.01 spec.,
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.2
That permits LTR or RTL, bot not an empty dir=, or
is it another SGML oddity I've never before heard of ?
The dir= is probably here to reset the text direction
to
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:24:35AM +0200,
Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 22 lines which said:
That permits LTR or RTL, bot not an empty dir=, or is it another
SGML oddity I've never before heard of ?
No, no, you're right, the important point I wanted you to read was
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM, The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Atom Bidirectional Attribute '
draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt as an Experimental RFC
The name of this draft is a
James M Snell wrote:
If another version of the draft is needed based on
last-call comments, I can make the name change then.
Leave it alone, please. Various tools have problems
with tracking changed names. Changing the name to
RFC at some point in time is IMO good enough.
I don't find
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Atom Bidirectional Attribute '
draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt as an Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.
