ROTECTED]>
To: "shogunx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: Meeting Locations
Las Vegas has ridiculously cheap air fares, large amounts of cheap
accomodation and many hotels that have the necessary conference
infrastructure.
Cancun and Acapulco ar
ROTECTED]>
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:40:07 -0700
> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Asunto: RE: Meeting Locations
>
>
>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
>> In Las Vegas I waited 8 ho
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> In Las Vegas I waited 8 hours in the security queue last time
> to return back to my home. Of course the flights already
> departed and as it was not a fault of the company, I needed
> to buy a new ticket, no refund and of course, I do
> De: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Fecha: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:52:50 -0700
> > Para: shogunx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Asunto: RE: Meeting Locations
> >
> > Las Vegas h
lam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:52:50 -0700
> Para: shogunx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Asunto: RE: Meeting Locations
>
> Las Vegas has ridiculously cheap air fares, large amounts of c
either US-Visit or the often
threatened visa requirements for countries that do not issue biometric
passports.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of shogunx
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:03 PM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Su
How about Daytona Beach?
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeffrey> On Thursday, July 14, 2005 08:50:16 PM -0700
> Jeffrey> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Anyone want to bet on Minneapolis - Its March after
> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeffrey> On Thursday, July 14, 2005 08:50:16 PM -0700
Jeffrey> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Anyone want to bet on Minneapolis - Its March after all.
Jeffrey> Sounds good to me.
Me too.
___
> De: Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organización: Brandenburg InternetWorking
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:09:16 -0700
> Para: John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ietf@ietf.org"
> Asu
On 19-jul-2005, at 16:19, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
From the IETF side, it permits serious negotiating for site
terms and operational efficiencies when a previous site is re-used.
Minneapolis has been a useful demonstration of this latter point,
I think.
Since nobody but Foretec has see
I have to say that every time we went back to Minneapolis, they got
friendlier. It also made our job easier because they knew what we needed,
and it wasn't a shock to them. Having extra tables in the common areas,
allowing us to wire up the bar, asking them to turn off their wireless,
and advance
> > As noted in the current thread, early site selection permits attendee
> > budgeting. From the IETF side, it permits serious negotiating for site
> > terms and operational efficiencies when a previous site is re-used.
> > Minneapolis has been a useful demonstration of this latter point, I t
--On tirsdag, juli 19, 2005 07:09:16 -0700 Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As noted in the current thread, early site selection permits attendee
budgeting. From the IETF side, it permits serious negotiating for site
terms and operational efficiencies when a previous site is re-used.
Is it reasonable for us to hope that, as things settle down over
time, we can reasonably expect to get to the "meeting times and
locations known 18 months to two years out" status that has been
the target for some years? Or, to put it differently, without
any unreasonable expectations about ho
John,
The short answer is "Yes" - identifying meeting locations
and times 18 to 24 months out is a plausible target.
Site ID is less a problem than Sponsor commitment, but the
answer remains "Yes".
Ray
Is it reasonable for us to hope that, as things settle down
over tim
Scott W Brim wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 05:27:45PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
My expectation is that we'll stick to the pattern of two N American
meetings plus one in another region - but meeting planning is an art,
not a science.
I like the deterministic formula based on the
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 05:27:45PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
> My expectation is that we'll stick to the pattern of two N American
> meetings plus one in another region - but meeting planning is an art,
> not a science.
I like the deterministic formula based on the number of drafts
wr
My expectation is that we'll stick to the pattern of two N American
meetings plus one in another region - but meeting planning is an art,
not a science.
Brian
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
There are a couple of helpful data points for many attendees. In my own
case, knowing there are two North Amer
There are a couple of helpful data points for many attendees. In my
own case, knowing there are two North American meetings planned, or
only one, in a given year tells me a lot about budgeting long before a
specific location is announced.
Spencer
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On Friday, 15 July, 2005 11:59 +0200 Brian E Carpenter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clint,
>
> Firstly, please note that this is now part of the IETF
> Administrative
> Ditrector's responsibility. I've put him on copy.
>
> Second, we all agree that locations should be chosen and
> announced
Clint,
Firstly, please note that this is now part of the IETF Administrative
Ditrector's responsibility. I've put him on copy.
Second, we all agree that locations should be chosen and announced
as early possible.
Third, there is a very high probability that IETF65 will be at a
US location and w
On Thursday, July 14, 2005 08:50:16 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone want to bet on Minneapolis - Its March after all.
Sounds good to me.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Anyone want to bet on Minneapolis - Its March after all.
Actually I am starting to grow fond of the hotel there.
Bill
> Clint
>
> I hope you get an answer to this!
>
> At 07:41 PM 7/14/2005 -0700, Clint Chaplin wrote:
>>How far in advance are the locations of IETF meetings determined? Is
>>there
Clint
I hope you get an answer to this!
At 07:41 PM 7/14/2005 -0700, Clint Chaplin wrote:
How far in advance are the locations of IETF meetings determined? Is
there any way to find out what the possible candidates are?
I'm having to budget travel for the next year, and knowing where IETF
65 w
How far in advance are the locations of IETF meetings determined? Is
there any way to find out what the possible candidates are?
I'm having to budget travel for the next year, and knowing where IETF
65 will be held would help me a lot.
--
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Wireless Security Technologist
Wi
)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robin Uyeshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62)
You are correct if you refe
vents organizing company for a few years.
Regards,
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Robin Uyeshiro
> Sent: 20 September, 2004 10:57 PM
> To: 'John C Klensin'; 'Lars Eggert'; 'Sam Hartman&#x
Would the IEEE 802 Plenaries have comparable geographical/logistical
requirements to IETF meetings? Their next few plenaries are scheduled
in San Antonio, Atlanta, San Francisco, Vancouver, New Orleans, San
Diego, and Dallas. All but one are in the US, and all are in North
America.
I attended
28 matches
Mail list logo
