Fred,
you talk about interoperability between vendors, this is good. Let
not forget interoperability with users, i.e. our own IETF document
interoperability with the external standard we leverage and the user
demand. Waiting for industrial products not to excite the public is
too long and ch
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:08 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
Having seen the consequences of one-step standards processes,
especially in environments in which the standards designers are not
very closely tied to products that are shipping or ready to ship, I
remain strongly committed to a standards mo
to expand on John's ps
for those of you who were not involved or who have forgotten the details
the note the IESG sent about their review of the ISD idea can be found at
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/msg01076.html
but the feeling that the WG got from the IESG review is better
viewe
--On Wednesday, 20 September, 2006 08:23 -0400 Scott Bradner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spencer remembered:
>> My understanding (as author of three of the proposals) was
>> that for most of the time newtrk was in existence, the
>> working group's attention was focused on ISDs as a way of
>>