> Ole,
>
> Just want to make sure I understand this response fully.
>
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
> >There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
> >process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
> >meeting.
>
> The ques
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/23/09 10:05 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
> > There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
> > process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/23/09 10:05 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
> process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
> meeting.
What do we mean by "third party" here? It seems risky
Cullen,
There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
meeting.
You've asked a bunch of good questions which deserve to be answered,
but we need a little time to craft a response. Stay tuned.
Ole
On
Ole,
Just want to make sure I understand this response fully.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
meeting.
The question about approval was
> From: Steve Crocker
> The Internet and the IETF are all about engaging, expanding,
> communicating and being open. ... More than a billion people live in
> China and their use of the Internet is expanding rapidly. ...
> Our first slogan was "Networks Bring People Together."
day, September 19, 2009 3:17 PM
> To: Steve Crocker
> Cc: IAOC IAOC; IETF Discussion
> Subject: Re: [IAOC] Request for community guidance on issue concerning
> a future meeting of the IETF
>
> Speaking just for myself, I agree with Steve. I think it that is
> better to enga
Speaking just for myself, I agree with Steve. I think it that is
better to engage than to retreat. Nothing is certain, but I also think
that it is highly likely that we would have a good meeting.
Regards
Marshall
On Sep 19, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
The choice is between engag
