Paragraph 3 of section 4 says:
Because this cipher suite is equivalent to an empty
"renegotiation_info" extension, only renegotiation_info" may be used
rehandshakes.
Leaving aside the incorrect punctuation, this doesn't make any sense to me.
In section 5, suggest replacing all occurren
Nir
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:06 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Cc: t...@ietf.org Group
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
> (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication
> Extension) to Proposed Standard
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, a
tf-tls-renegotiation (Transport
LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
> On 09-12-01 12:19 AM, "David-Sarah Hopwood"
> wrote:
>
> > The IESG wrote:
> >> The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Sec