Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-02-17 03:47, Livingood, Jason wrote: >> Parts of the challenge here is that turning on IPv6 (publishing a ) >> can also cause brokenness for users that have no IPv6 connectivity, e.g., >> those relying on broken 6to4 relays. This has been documented all over >> the place, for example h

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Livingood, Jason
>Parts of the challenge here is that turning on IPv6 (publishing a ) >can also cause brokenness for users that have no IPv6 connectivity, e.g., >those relying on broken 6to4 relays. This has been documented all over >the place, for example here: >

RE: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> On 2011-2-15, at 19:45, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: >> Noting the increasing length of the list >> athttp://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/participants/ > > ...I mostly note that I see very few eyeball ISPs on that list (with the > notable exception of two large US cable ISPs - great, guys!) > > Turn

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Lars Eggert wrote: > On 2011-2-15, at 19:45, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: >> Noting the increasing length of the list >> athttp://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/participants/ > > ...I mostly note that I see very few eyeball ISPs on that list (with the > notable exception

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Richard L. Barnes
Parts of the challenge here is that turning on IPv6 (publishing a ) can also cause brokenness for users that have no IPv6 connectivity, e.g., those relying on broken 6to4 relays. This has been documented all over the place, for example here:

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-16 Thread Lars Eggert
On 2011-2-15, at 19:45, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > Noting the increasing length of the list > athttp://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/participants/ ...I mostly note that I see very few eyeball ISPs on that list (with the notable exception of two large US cable ISPs - great, guys!) Turning on IPv6

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-15 Thread Russ Housley
I have asked that www.ietf.org be added to the sites that are already IPv6 enabled. I've also nudged the folks associated with these other organizations to do the same. Russ On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:45:01PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > Noting the increasing length of the list at > h

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-15 Thread Sabahattin Gucukoglu
On 15 Feb 2011, at 18:56, Shumon Huque wrote: > Maybe it's because IETF/IRTF already have their outward facing > services available over IPv6 (Web, Mail, &, DNS at least - I checked > only for ietf.org and irtf.org). Perhaps, but the same is true for ISOC.org. Anyway, I'm not questioning ISOC's

Re: World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-15 Thread Shumon Huque
Maybe it's because IETF/IRTF already have their outward facing services available over IPv6 (Web, Mail, &, DNS at least - I checked only for ietf.org and irtf.org). The stated purpose of IPv6 day seems to be to get folks who don't have any IPv6 in production yet to make it available for a 24-hou

World IPv6 Day and Us

2011-02-15 Thread Sabahattin Gucukoglu
Noting the increasing length of the list at http://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/participants/ (now with many former staunch nay-sayers on it, pleasingly), and that the ISOC considers itself a member, I think it only right to point out that we (IETF, IRTF, IESG, IAB, ICANN, IANA, et al) are not list