dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread John C Klensin
--On Friday, July 26, 2013 11:29 -0700 SM wrote: > POSH has not published a session agenda. However, the BoF is > listed on the meeting agenda. Is the BoF cancelled or will > this be one of those willful violations of IETF Best Current > Practices? On a similar note, according to its agenda,

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread Tim Chown
On 26 Jul 2013, at 21:48, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Friday, July 26, 2013 11:29 -0700 SM > wrote: > >> POSH has not published a session agenda. However, the BoF is >> listed on the meeting agenda. Is the BoF cancelled or will >> this be one of those willful violations of IETF Best C

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread John C Klensin
--On Friday, July 26, 2013 22:48 +0100 Tim Chown wrote: >... >> On a similar note, according to its agenda, the core of the >> DNS-SD Extensions BOF (dnssdext) is apparently >> draft-lynn-sadnssd-requirements-01. The link from the agenda >> page [1] yields a 404 error and attempts to look up

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread Tim Chown
On 26 Jul 2013, at 23:31, John C Klensin wrote: > --On Friday, July 26, 2013 22:48 +0100 Tim Chown > wrote: >> >> That means the charter agreed from the bashing of the draft >> charter in the previous 40 minutes, not that a charter is >> already agreed. > > If there is something to be bashed f

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread John C Klensin
--On Saturday, July 27, 2013 00:37 +0100 Tim Chown wrote: >... > While we/you can try to guess what the problems are, it may be > better to surveymonkey those who registered as newcomers in a > couple of weeks and ask them about their experience, whether > they were aware of certain things, and

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-26 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
If I had known this was taking place I might have made the trip to Berlin. I am very interested in the problem this tries to solve. I think it is the wrong way to go about it but I am interested in the problem. The case for having some sort of local name discovery mechanism is clear in both the e

Re: dnssdext BOF (was: Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info))

2013-07-27 Thread Tim Chown
On 27 Jul 2013, at 02:20, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > If I had known this was taking place I might have made the trip to Berlin. > > I am very interested in the problem this tries to solve. I think it is the > wrong way to go about it but I am interested in the problem. > > The case for hav