On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:23 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:12 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>> Also: the date on the problem statement seems awfully aggressive. My
>> thinking is that the problem statement should at least discuss (as is
>> mentioned in the charter) how
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:12 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> Also: the date on the problem statement seems awfully aggressive. My
> thinking is that the problem statement should at least discuss (as is
> mentioned in the charter) how "replays" are completely legitimate uses
> of DKIM, and thus limit
Also: the date on the problem statement seems awfully aggressive. My
thinking is that the problem statement should at least discuss (as is
mentioned in the charter) how "replays" are completely legitimate uses
of DKIM, and thus limit the solution space to not break those uses.
Also: I hope
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dkim-04-05: Block
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document, along with
