On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 12:21:51AM +0100, John R. Levine wrote:
One of us should send in a separate technical erratum saying that DKIM
key records SHOULD be published only for SDID domains that have
corresponding MX or A records and can receive mail.
I believe your later posting on this
John Levine wrote:
http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata
Looks good to me.
Near the end of section 12, I'd change
The real-world efficacy of any but the most basic bindings between
the SDID or AUID and other identities is not well established,
to:
The real-world
Dave CROCKER wrote:
Barry Leiba wrote:
The new text has all been
agreed to on this list over the last week, in the three sub-threads
that Dave started... which is why we only need a brief check to make
sure they're OK. We're not excluding anything.
Folks,
To
There remains some disagreement on whether the informative note
contained in the last paragraph of the text I proposed on March 27
should appear in the ADSP draft. The note said:
Informative Note: ADSP is incompatible with DKIM signing by parent
domains described in section 3.8 of [RFC4871]
