On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:37:50 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
>> The use of the DKIM l=, z= and x= features provide a means for
>> recipients to separately evaluate DKIM signatures without reliance on
>> intermediary assessors. In addition, the A-R header does not capture
>> the IP address w
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:30:38 +0100, Doug Otis
wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> For sure, individual recipients may wish to check signatures etc.
>> for themselves, espeicially if they have doubts about the policies
>> applied by their local assessors. If the local
I think Murray's point is a fair one. This thread isn't
really progressing in terms of what to in/exclude from
4871bis as far as I can see so let's leave it there.
Stephen.
Doug Otis wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>>> The use of the DKIM l=, z= and x= feature
