Shit happens :)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net wrote:
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
Hence my original post with the suggested special consideration text
for section 5.4 in regards to 5322.from.
--
My apology to Jeff. It was not Jeff Macdonald who wrote the text
John R. Levine wrote:
So here's a 0th cut at a list of headers where we should recommend
N+1 entries in the h=
rfc 5322
From
Sender
Reply-To (maybe not, since often smashed by mailing lists)
To
Cc(not Bcc even though it's 0/1)
Message-ID
Subject
I don't see incentives to spoof:
MIME-Version
Content-Type
What are the gains?
This has been discussed at great length. Please consult the list
archives.
R's,
John
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
John R. Levine wrote:
I don't see incentives to spoof:
MIME-Version
Content-Type
What are the gains?
This has been discussed at great length. Please consult the list archives.
Thanks - you couldn't summarize or its too hard to explain?
I can search, certainly not consult. But