On 09/Nov/10 03:05, John R. Levine wrote:
Signers SHOULD take reasonable steps to ensure
that the messages they're signing are valid according to [RFC 5322,
etc]. Leaving the definition of reasonable out allows flexibility. It
may be waffly, but I like the approach in this case.
This
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Keys Identified Mail Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : RFC4871 Implementation Report
Author(s) : M. Kucherawy
Filename:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:05 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
FWIW, my DKIM verifier has for several weeks rejected anything which has
an extra of any of these headers:
From Sender Subject Date To Cc MIME-Version Content-Type
Content-Transfer-Encoding
I haven't collected detailed
FWIW, my DKIM verifier has for several weeks rejected anything which has
an extra of any of these [omitted] headers:
Thanks for putting it that way, John. It makes it easier to clear the
issue: I think everybody agrees that DKIM specifications say nothing
about rejecting. Therefore,
