Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review

2011-07-11 Thread Charles Lindsey
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:53:58 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy m...@cloudmark.com wrote: Actually, let me revise that a bit: Agents that evaluate or apply DKIM output need to be aware that a DKIM signer can sign messages that are malformed (e.g., violate RFC5322), or become malformed in

Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review

2011-07-11 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 3:52 AM To: DKIM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review Agents that evaluate or apply DKIM

Re: [ietf-dkim] Doublefrom language should be in ADSP, not core

2011-07-11 Thread Dave CROCKER
On 7/10/2011 7:51 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: -Original Message- From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:46 PM To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Doublefrom language

Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review

2011-07-11 Thread J.D. Falk
On Jul 11, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: Given that today's the deadline, we will have to go with something like this or nothing at all (which in fact I would prefer because I think all of this is adequately covered by existing text, and I believe consensus and the AD

Re: [ietf-dkim] Doublefrom language should be in ADSP, not core

2011-07-11 Thread J.D. Falk
On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: On 7/10/2011 7:51 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: -Original Message- From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:46 PM To:

[ietf-dkim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15.txt

2011-07-11 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Keys Identified Mail Working Group of the IETF. Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures Author(s) : D. Crocker

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15.txt

2011-07-11 Thread Barry Leiba
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Keys Identified Mail Working Group of the IETF.        Title           : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures ... A URL for this Internet-Draft is:

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15.txt still permits deceptive DKIM results

2011-07-11 Thread Douglas Otis
8.15. Attacks Involving Extra Header Fields ... ,--- Agents that evaluate or apply DKIM output need to be aware that a DKIM signer can sign messages that are malformed (e.g., violate [RFC5322], such as by having multiple instances of a field that is only permitted once), or that become malformed