On 02/11/2018 06:20 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/11/2018 5:54 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Mike
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Mike,
On 2/11/2018 5:54 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Mike
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Mike,
Please review the participation rules
On 02/11/2018 05:46 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/10/2018 10:47 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
But I still think this entire conversation is silly in its
theoreticality.
Extra design complexity and consuming development resources --
programming, bench testing, interoperability testing -- for
On 2/10/2018 10:47 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
But I still think this entire conversation is silly in its theoreticality.
Extra design complexity and consuming development resources --
programming, bench testing, interoperability testing -- for something
that is not essential, nevermind
On 2/10/2018 9:59 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
MIME was in significant use quite a bit before ESMTP was operational.
In fact it's a non-trivial feature that MIME only requires adoption by
author and recipient and not by /any/ of the infrastructure. IE, not
by SMTP.
Yes, I know, but I wish
