It'd be useful for us, as chairs, to know if we have consensus
around requirements for interop between implementations of 4871
and 4871bis.
Some of the discussions about things to deprecate may affect that,
so if we have a clear understanding in advance it might short-cut
some discussions of spec
On Jun 2, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Key Records:
>
> 1) 4871bis-compliant code MUST be able to use 4871-compliant key
> records
> 2) 4871-compliant code MUST be able to use 4871bis-compliant key
> records
>
> Signatures:
>
> 3) 4871-compliant code generated signatures MUST be
> Key Records:
>
> 1) 4871bis-compliant code [MUST|SHOULD|MAY] be able to use
>4871-compliant key records
SHOULD, in the classic "you should have a good reason not to" sense.
> 2) 4871-compliant code [MUST|SHOULD|MAY] be able to use
>4871bis-compliant key records
MAY
> Signatures:
>
>
>Key Records:
>
>1) 4871bis-compliant code SHOULD be able to use
> 4871-compliant key records
>2) 4871-compliant code SHOULD be able to use
> 4871bis-compliant key records
>
>Signatures:
>
>3) 4871-compliant code generated signatures SHOULD be
> verifiable by 4871bis-compliant code
>4) 4871bi
