I don't think this is really something this WG needs to deal with, though I
could be wrong. It's forwarded here just for informational purposes.
From: marf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:marf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Murray
S. Kucherawy
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:11 PM
To: m...@ietf.org
>- In order to make use of ADSP, Y needs to change which MTA it's
>using. This is almost certainly an expensive effort.
>
>- Y simply can't use ADSP.
>
>- The DKIM reporting extensions should have a flag that says DSNs
>should not cause generation of fraud reports.
I'll
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:29 AM
> To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM re
On 10/13/10 3:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> - In order to make use of ADSP, Y needs to change which MTA it's
>> using. This is almost certainly an expensive effort.
>>
>> - Y simply can't use ADSP.
>>
>> - The DKIM reporting extensions should have a flag that says DSNs
On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> or
> a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
> nature of this mail stream?
No. Never do this.
Selectors are an operational convenience for key rotation and
ease of domain delegation. They have no semantics b
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>
>
>> or
>> a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
>> nature of this mail stream?
>
> No. Never do this.
>
> Selectors are an operational convenience for k
On 10/13/2010 2:03 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Steve Atkins
> wrote:
>>> or
>>> a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
>>> nature of this mail stream?
>>
>> No. Never do this.
>>
>> Selectors are an operational convenience for key
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:55:25 am Steve Atkins wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> > or
> > a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
> > nature of this mail stream?
>
> No. Never do this.
>
> Selectors are an operational convenienc
On Oct 13, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:55:25 am Steve Atkins wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>>> or
>>> a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
>>> nature of this mail stream?
>>
>> No.
On 10/13/2010 11:25 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:55:25 am Steve Atkins wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>>> or
>>> a special selector (e.g. s=notifications), to identify the different
>>> nature of this mail stream?
>>
>> No. Never do
10 matches
Mail list logo