-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of bill.ox...@cox.com
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 5:49 PM
To: jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call
On 10/04/2010 10:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
The working group last call will run through
last call on
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Chapter 2: as for DKIM specific definitions used in this document, they
cannot be found in [EMAIL-ARCH]. Please add [DKIM] here as source of
definitions.
The top of chapter 2 contains [DKIM] which is the formal reference to that
specification
-Original Message-
From: Rolf E. Sonneveld [mailto:r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:36 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: DKIM Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-
implementation-report
Are we looking
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote:
Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
The working group
At 13:41 04-10-10, Barry Leiba wrote:
Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
I read the implementation report for RFC 4871
(draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02). It addresses the
comments I
Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.
This implementation
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
it's ready to go.
I have reviewed it, and it looks ready to go.
R's,
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
] Working group last call on
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
it's ready to go.
I have reviewed it, and it looks ready to go.
R's,
John
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 5:06 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: DKIM Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim
...@mipassoc.org] On
Behalf Of John R. Levine [jo...@iecc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 2:06 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: DKIM Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments
On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:06 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
it's ready to go.
I have reviewed it, and it looks ready to go.
+1
Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 4:41 PM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Regarding
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Actually the data are still there. It was just reworded, as per Jeff's
suggestion:
Identities: 73.8% of the signatures observed included a d= value
matching the domain in the From: field.
...so this is a non-issue.
Sure it is. Was it 78.9% for all
We are not holding up the dkim spec, we are wanting a datapoint to be kept in
the draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:40 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:06 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues.
15 matches
Mail list logo
