Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Now let's see if we can clarify once and for all that d= is the
identifier, and i= only means what the signer wants it to mean, so you
can only interpret it to the extent you recognize the
That kind of signing would prevent using i= for social networking,
because even if Grandma pays for the account (and thus the user_id
roughly identifies her), drunken Uncle Ernie lives in the basement
and sponges off her AOL subscription, and they'd both have the same
i= value.
But as you have
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Now let's see if we can clarify once and for all that d= is the
identifier, and i= only means what the signer wants it to mean, so you
can only interpret it to the extent you recognize the signer.
Good. Can the errata document
