Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: >> Now let's see if we can clarify once and for all that d= is the >> identifier, and i= only means what the signer wants it to mean, so you >> can only interpret it to the extent you recognize the signer. > > Good. Can the errata document that seeks to clarify SDID v/s UAID > please, please drive this point home? With enough MUST NOT BE ASSUMED > type wording?
Sure... Please suggest specific text to add/change in the draft Errata. -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
