Re: [ietf-privacy] Fwd: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.txt

2016-06-23 Thread Christian Huitema
(Moving this conversation to DNS-SD mailing list) On Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:53 AM, S Moonesamy wrote: > > Hi Tim, > At 05:18 22-06-2016, Tim Chown wrote: > >We're encouraging discussion of privacy considerations in the WG. As a > >result, we now have a draft (see below), including an initial

Re: [ietf-privacy] Fwd: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.txt

2016-06-23 Thread S Moonesamy
Hi Tim, At 05:18 22-06-2016, Tim Chown wrote: We're encouraging discussion of privacy considerations in the WG. As a result, we now have a draft (see below), including an initial proposal for a solution, for which we'd welcome wider review. The draft also addresses mDNS/DNS-SD privacy within

Re: [ietf-privacy] Fwd: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.txt

2016-06-22 Thread Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Thanks for this. Some comments: * The last paragraph in Section 2.4 seems to be making the inevitable "what can we really do about fingerprinting?" argument. It would be great if you could acknowledge that despite the severe technical and practical limits on combatting fingerprinting,

[ietf-privacy] Fwd: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.txt

2016-06-22 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, In the dnssd WG, we are developing methods to enable scalable DNS-based service discovery, which in practice means enabling mDNS/DNS-SD to work over multiple links within a site. As defined, mDNS/DNS-SD are link-local protocols, not forwarded by routers. If successful, one ‘win’ is that