Something is horribly wrong with the data here.
I overplotted your reference Au foil against mine, and yours has distorted
XANES and too high EXAFS intensity compared to my data. Your amplitude factor
is 1.54 which also confirms that something was wrong in the experiment. Perhaps
- a misalignme
Hi Alex,
I have make Al K-edge measurements before. Unfortunately, the beamline is no
longer available. It was Jumbo (BL III-3) at SSRL. At least, I don't think that
Jumbo came back after the upgrade.
I have made Total Electron Yield, Partial Electron Yield (Auger), and
Fluorescence measurem
Hi Alex,
You might find the list of beamlines at
http://www.iucr.org/resources/commissions/xafs/, compiled by Federico
Boscherini, a useful way to find a beamline that can acces at the Al
K-edge.
--Matt
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Kompch, Alexander
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> for the analysi
For Al:K edge is rather hard to find a dedicated beamline for XAS. Of
course are few where it can be measured, like in Bessy, Berlin U41-PGM,
or BL1A in UV-SOR, Okazaki, Japan, or BACH in Elettra, Trieste,
Itally. I do not how is situation in America, sorry.
In this energy region you have to mea
Hi Alex
The SGM beamline at the CLS does fine work at the Al K-edge. However, I'm not
familiar with much Al EXAFS work, you would have to ask the beamline scientist,
Tom Regier, about that.
tom.reg...@lightsource.ca
Cheers
Lachlan
> -Original Message-
> From: ifeffit-boun...@millenia
Dear all,
for the analysis of the location of the Al-dopant in ZnO, I am looking for
suitable EXAFS beamlines. Dopant concentrations are 1-10%. So far I have only
found ALS 6.3.1 and NSLS X15B.
Can anybody recommend beamlines for Al EXAFS?
My EXAFS experience is so far limited to the high energ
How significant are the photoelectron effects in hard X-rays compared with the
core-hole effect?
What I'm really after is a criterion for determining, at least roughly, how
narrow a real, physical feature can be.
mam
- Original Message -
From: vik...@comcast.net
To: ifeffit@mi
Yes, Marian, that makes sense. Anatoly Frenkel also has a number of good papers
based on this kind of approach. While the approaches differ in detail, they are
all based on using the ratio of CNs, and thus avoiding the issue of having to
extract S02 from a standard.
--Scott Calvin
Sarah Lawrenc
Hi Scott,
thanks for the suggestion.
I've looked through your recent publications and also read your post
from Fri, 04 Feb 2011, concerning the R dependence of s02. Comparing the
CNs of the 1st and 2nd shell (that are the only ones that are properly
resolved in my spectra) makes a lot of sense.
Hi Marian,
Have you tried what I suggested in the sections you quote below? With a
ruthenium metal catalyst, you can probably see some second and perhaps third
shell neighbors. The ratio between the coordination numbers for the shells is a
measure of particle size that is independent of S02, an
Dear Wayne and Grant Bunker,
thanks a lot for the explanation!
To be honest, I didn't know the Ramsauer-Townsend effect before.
I think it's ok to show the spektra without subtracting out the scattering
phase. As long as I know what's going on and as long as I can explain it it
will be fine.
Th
11 matches
Mail list logo
