, NY 14831
607-974-3364
-Original Message-
From: ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
[mailto:ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Scott
Calvin
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:02 PM
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Origin of terminology self
It's definitely a misnomer. I use overabsorption and encourage others to do
so. I suppose to track it down would require going
back over the seminal papers on the subject.
mam
On 11/16/2010 10:19 AM, Scott Calvin wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I'm currently working on a
I tried a few searches, but rapidly get lost in other uses of the
term. My guess is we borrowed it from some other spectroscopy, much
the way we borrowed Debye-Waller factor from XRD, and then proceeded
to change its meaning. But it would be nice to be able to track that
down.
--Scott
It's a term taken from x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, or probably
really any fluorescence spectroscopy, where it has very sensible
meaning: the attenuation of the fluorescence signal by the sample
itself. I would even say it is used mostly correctly in XAFS, or at
least with a similar intent as
Hi all,
I think this comes from the misunderstanding of the effect and the try
to explain it as the additional absorption of outgoing light. Am I right?
kicaj
W dniu 10-11-16 19:19, Scott Calvin pisze:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I'm currently working on a textbook on XAFS
analysis.
