On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:36 PM, 0 <0...@0throot.com> wrote:
>> I would say that the post under consideration falls fairly under points
>> 2 and 6 above and is not OT.
>
> I agree with you that the above mentioned points are relevant to the
> list in some way, but where do we draw the line ? I am su
Even by ILUGC standards, the number of meta discussions has gone overboard
the last few days!!
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:50 +0530, 0 wrote:
> > this link seems to be going to some soft porn site for me
>
> Really? It seems to be working fine for me.
>
> Unless you are on MS Windows,
I know we disagree occasionally, but that is no reason to insult me ;-)
> it is most likely due to your DNS
On 07/06/2012 03:43 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:36 +0530, 0 wrote:
>> I am sure, there are
>> going to a bunch of news articles every day on DRM, patents,
>> copyright
>> etc. For example, the recent controversy over Blizzard and Diablo III
>> on
>> GNU/Linux (over wine)
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:36 +0530, 0 wrote:
> > I would say that the post under consideration falls fairly under
> points
> > 2 and 6 above and is not OT.
>
> I agree with you that the above mentioned points are relevant to the
> list in some way, but where do we draw the line ?
that depends on
On 07/06/2012 01:41 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:57 +0530, 0 wrote:
>> IMO, The article was more about Apple and its IP policy in general.
>> The
>> comments sections in the article throw more light on this. Although
>> an
>> interesting read, I thought it was OT. I could
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:43 +0530, Sundaram KR wrote:
> lawgon said: "I would say that the post under consideration falls
> fairly under points
> 2 and 6 above and is not OT."
>
> Objection sustained.
does this mean it is OT or it is not?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
__
lawgon said: "I would say that the post under consideration falls fairly under
points
2 and 6 above and is not OT."
Objection sustained.
...KRS
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:57 +0530, 0 wrote:
> >>> http://www.berkeleylug.com/?p=1045
> >>> Informative.
> >>>
> >>
> >> [OT] tag please.
> >
> > what is OT about it?
>
> IMO, The article was more about Apple and its IP policy in general.
> The
> comments sections in the article throw more light o
On 07/06/2012 08:05 AM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 07:38 +0530, 0 wrote:
>> On 07/05/2012 11:00 PM, A. Mani wrote:
>>> http://www.berkeleylug.com/?p=1045
>>> Informative.
>>>
>>
>> [OT] tag please.
>
> what is OT about it?
IMO, The article was more about Apple and its IP poli
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 07:38 +0530, 0 wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 11:00 PM, A. Mani wrote:
> > http://www.berkeleylug.com/?p=1045
> > Informative.
> >
>
> [OT] tag please.
what is OT about it?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www
On 07/05/2012 11:00 PM, A. Mani wrote:
> http://www.berkeleylug.com/?p=1045
> Informative.
>
[OT] tag please.
RMS summarized it the best on Steve Jobs death by quoting a Chicago Mayor,
"I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone"
--
0
___
ILUGC M
12 matches
Mail list logo
