On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:47 +0530, mohi wrote:
> When you think of kicking one out, then freedom fails. Plus there are
> lots
> of issues regarding attacks targeted. If action has to be taken for
> what you
> mentioned, the same action should be taken at all times.
it was a joke ;-) (reminder to
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 08:03 +0530, sibi raj wrote:
> > This is called as democracy , One person Dictates and all others
> > listen to it ...
>
> who is this one person who has dictated this? (it is not me as I only
> joined this
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 12:48 +0530, sibi raj wrote:
> Hello Thyagarajan Shanmugham ,
> That was an entirely new post. Just 2 lines were from the previous
> mail .
> I am fully supportive in case of interleaved posting .
> But when some one new does a top or bottom posting why we need to be
> so h
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 08:53 +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> --- On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
> wrote:
> | The
> | correct method of posting is 'interleaved posting' and not bottom
> | posting. @shakthi+Srini - this has been there for several years and
> it
> | is misleading.
>
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 08:03 +0530, sibi raj wrote:
> This is called as democracy , One person Dictates and all others
> listen to it ...
who is this one person who has dictated this? (it is not me as I only
joined this group in 2005 and the rules were already there). Let us find
this bad fellow an
But when some one new does a top or bottom posting why we need to be so
> harsh to him ?
> That was my point over there .
> Not being harsh isn't a strict rule written any where but a basic human
> nature .
>
>
+1 .
--
*Thank You
Best Regards*
*Yuvaraj L*
___
Hello Thyagarajan Shanmugham ,
That was an entirely new post. Just 2 lines were from the previous mail .
I am fully supportive in case of interleaved posting .
But when some one new does a top or bottom posting why we need to be so harsh
to him ?
That was my point over there .
Not being harsh i
Hi Sibi,
I find difficult in reading your reply, Kindly consider to the interleaved
posting mechanism and trimming unwanted lines out.
I think, interleaved posting makes life comfort for the readers.
regards,
Thyagarajan Shanmugham.
___
ILUGC Mailing
Hi,
--- On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
| The
| correct method of posting is 'interleaved posting' and not bottom
| posting. @shakthi+Srini - this has been there for several years and it
| is misleading.
\--
I am not a moderator for this group. I had updated my presenta
1. do not top post
2. do not bottom post
Last but not the least ..
3. Any one other than the person who framed the law - Please dont post:))
This is called as democracy , One person Dictates and all others listen to it
...
> the guideline is wrong on that point
Or am i wrong in naming it ?
Accor
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 19:09 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/pipermail/ilugc/2009-November/052634.html
> have a look at the guidelines. They suggest bottom post. you better
> follow that .
the guideline is wrong on that point - I have repeatedly pointed this
out to the
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 19:07 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> Mr.Kenneth whats the problem with you .
there is no problem with me - the problem is with you.
> First you said do not top post .
> Then you are
> asking to avoid bottom post . So Where should we post ?
1. do not top post
2. do not bo
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:09 PM, ganessh kumar rp
wrote:
> http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/pipermail/ilugc/2009-November/052634.html
> have a look at the guidelines. They suggest bottom post. you better
> follow that .
The preferred quoting/posting style on this list is interleaved
posting. It means th
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:07 PM, ganessh kumar rp
wrote:
> Mr.Kenneth whats the problem with you . First you said do not top post .
> Then you are
> asking to avoid bottom post . So Where should we post ?
>
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:
Mr.Kenneth whats the problem with you . First you said do not top post .
Then you are
asking to avoid bottom post . So Where should we post ?
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:06 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> > LUG-CBE
>
> ilug...@googlegroup
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:06 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> LUG-CBE
ilug...@googlegroups.com
please avoid bottom posting
--
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:15 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> > i am really sorry . I had exams all these days so couldn't be active
> > for the
> > past few days
> > So whats going on in our LUG . i cant see anyone in out irc channel
>
>
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:15 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> i am really sorry . I had exams all these days so couldn't be active
> for the
> past few days
> So whats going on in our LUG . i cant see anyone in out irc channel
1. do not bottom post
2. which lug are you talking about
if ilugc
3
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:08 +0530, prasath s wrote:
> can anyone send coimbatore user group mailing list link...
1. please do not top post
2. ilug...@googlegroups.com
--
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iit
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM, prasath s wrote:
> Hi all,
> can anyone send coimbatore user group mailing list link...
>
> On 10/5/10, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 18:15 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Mr .Ramam and Kenneth
> >
> > I am arranging a pr
Hi all,
can anyone send coimbatore user group mailing list link...
On 10/5/10, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 18:15 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Mr .Ramam and Kenneth
>
> I am arranging a preliminary meeting on saturday - please come
> --
> regards
> KG
> h
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 18:15 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
>
> Thanks Mr .Ramam and Kenneth
I am arranging a preliminary meeting on saturday - please come
--
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/m
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:59 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> > If you want to continue the discussion on the name issue .please start
> > a new
> > thread
> > and discuss it there . We need some ideas to start the club . So
> > please help
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:59 +0530, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> If you want to continue the discussion on the name issue .please start
> a new
> thread
> and discuss it there . We need some ideas to start the club . So
> please help
> for that
I am in Ooty, but spend a lot of time in Coimbatore and
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 09:31 +0530, Ravi Jaya wrote:
> seeing an attrition[1] in bring a glug, for reasons of Anti-M$ and
> similar
> > ideas of FSF(which i learnt from Mr.Siddarth session which happened
> in the
> > Aug ilugc meet).
> >
> We shouldn't forget, that we win our bread and butter thoug
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Raman.P wrote:
> --- On Sun, 3/10/10, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
>
>> If you want to continue the discussion on the name issue
>> .please start a new
>> thread
>> and discuss it there . We need some ideas to start the club
>> . So please help
>> for that
>
> Here are
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, ganessh kumar rp wrote:
> If you want to continue the discussion on the name issue
> .please start a new
> thread
> and discuss it there . We need some ideas to start the club
> . So please help
> for that
Here are some effective tips (what I think)
a.You can start meeting
Hello Ganesh ,
For starting a Glug/Lug ( I dont want to debate on it anymore on this thread
as told by Ganesh), target a single college , it would be good if its your
college , then speak with the students . They would most probably be your
friends or in worst case friends of friends . Then
2010/10/3 Thyagarajan தியாகராஜன்
> Hi,
>
> >>It is an endless discussion.
> It is their wish to name their group.
>
> But one should draw the line between lug and glug. I am trying to add
> something to it.
>
> >>We have given enough links and points to think.
> Let us leave it in their hands.
>
Hi,
>>It is an endless discussion.
It is their wish to name their group.
But one should draw the line between lug and glug. I am trying to add
something to it.
>>We have given enough links and points to think.
Let us leave it in their hands.
Ofcourse,it is in their hands.Advocating is our job,
Fine.
It is an endless discussion.
It is their wish to name their group.
We have given enough links and points to think.
Let us leave it in their hands.
Instead of naming a group,
we have to think on how to help for their activities.
Still, if we want to discuss on the naming a group,
please st
Hi,
Shall we stop here on discussing how to call a FOSS user group in this
> thread?
>
> Linux or GNU/Linux or GNU/Apache/Mozilla/BSD/X/Y/Z/A/B/C/D/Linux ?
>
> It is coimbore friend's own wish to name their group.
> We have given enough links from them to read and proceed.
>
> It will be nice if w
Friends.
Shall we stop here on discussing how to call a FOSS user group in this thread?
Linux or GNU/Linux or GNU/Apache/Mozilla/BSD/X/Y/Z/A/B/C/D/Linux ?
It is coimbore friend's own wish to name their group.
We have given enough links from them to read and proceed.
It will be nice if we discus
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 22:12 +0530, விக்னேஷ் நந்த குமார் wrote:
> Not exactly. There are a few GLUGS too [1],[2]. We can say there are more
> LUGs than GLUGs.
> [1] http://www.gnu.org.in/glug-meet
> [2] http://www.glugot/tce.edu
It is http://glugot.tce.edu and also there is
http://glug-madurai.org
seeing an attrition[1] in bring a glug, for reasons of Anti-M$ and similar
> ideas of FSF(which i learnt from Mr.Siddarth session which happened in the
> Aug ilugc meet).
>
We shouldn't forget, that we win our bread and butter though the proprietary
companies.
What we preach shouldn't differ from
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, Akilan R wrote:
> Calling it as GNU/Linux is just an acknowledgement that
> Linux is just a
> kernel and not an Operating System and that GNU project has
> contributed a
> lot to that OS. Its unfair for GNU guys(not only for RMS,
> but to all those
> who works in that pro
Hi,
Whether GLUG or LUG member, you will be passionate in driving (Gnu)Linux to
all categories of people,
As a glug member I am not allowed to have a dual boot system (M$ windows
and Gnu Linux) as the gnu philosopher says
"The free software movement has campaigned for computer users' freedom sin
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:28 AM, balachandar muruganantham <
mbchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I humbly request everyone to STOP on this debate.
>
> This thread have violated the guidelines
> 1. top posting by many people
> 2. personal attack on members
> 3. inappropriate subject
> 4.
>
>
I agree that
I humbly request everyone to STOP on this debate.
This thread have violated the guidelines
1. top posting by many people
2. personal attack on members
3. inappropriate subject
4.
I humbly request everyone to follow
1. Mailing List Etiquette
http://www.shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/presentations/m
Hi,
I agree with you completely except for one bit: I don't know if you can
> relate GLUG and Anti- MS sentiments. I myself prefer to call it GNU/Linux
> but never indulge in MS bashing or even call it M$. I don't think many
> people passionate about software freedom agree with many of Mr.Siddar
2010/10/2 Thyagarajan தியாகராஜன்
> IMO, having it as LUG can give an accommodation to widest audience. I am
> seeing an attrition[1] in bring a glug, for reasons of Anti-M$ and similar
> ideas of FSF(which i learnt from Mr.Siddarth session which happened in the
> Aug ilugc meet). I feel being sp
Hi,
I am registering my thoughts, feel free to fire me, if you disagree..
IMO, having it as LUG can give an accommodation to widest audience. I am
seeing an attrition[1] in bring a glug, for reasons of Anti-M$ and similar
ideas of FSF(which i learnt from Mr.Siddarth session which happened in the
2010/10/2 விக்னேஷ் நந்த குமார் :
> Not exactly. There are a few GLUGS too [1],[2]. We can say there are more
> LUGs than GLUGs.
> [1] http://www.gnu.org.in/glug-meet
> [2] http://www.glugot/tce.edu
Yes, I was wrong about my observations. There does seem to be a page
about the FSF trying to hijack
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <
siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Anirudh Ranganath
> wrote:
> > As far as naming goes, i personally vouch for ilugcbe, but if a majority
> of
> > contributors from Coimbatore want GLUG, we can review it. Va
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Anirudh Ranganath
wrote:
> As far as naming goes, i personally vouch for ilugcbe, but if a majority of
> contributors from Coimbatore want GLUG, we can review it. Valid arguments
> for and against GNU/LINUX are given in many websites including wikipedia and
> gnu's
Hey,
Posted a message to the mailing list 2 days back, but for some reason, it didnt
reach the mailing list.
Heres the message:
Guys,
Coming back to topic, Ganessh(FOSS club representative) and I went and met the
CS
dept HOD who was receptive to this idea. For mail server infrastructure, we
Kenneth Gonsalves writes:
>
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 14:02 +0530, JAGANADH G wrote:
> > > cbe-linux exists on yahoogroups. This group has a steadily
> > increasing
> > > list of subscribers and occasional chatter. Unfortunately I have not
> > > seen anyone located physically in and around the are
> hi ,
> i like the work of u guys towards open source by forming ILUG-Chennai. i
wish itwould be nice if there exists such a group in coimbatore too . me and
my friends are very much excited to have such group in our city . If such a
community doesnt exist in coimbatore we invite all linux users a
48 matches
Mail list logo
