Dear All,
Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
cheers
Ravi Jaya
___
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe "
in the subject or body of the message.
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
>
>
> cheers
> Ravi Jaya
>
Dear All,
What did i asked you? an alternative tool.
but where did this thread is heading too.
thank God I didn't
visit www.osalt.com
___
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe "
in the subject or body of the message.
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
On 5/14/08, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
Try kompozer !!
regards
VK
___
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe "
in the subject or body of
On 14-May-08, at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya wrote:
Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
a text editor + knowledge of CSS and HTML
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/
___
To unsubscribe
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>
> On 14-May-08, at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya wrote:
>
>> Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
>
> a text editor + knowledge of CSS and HTML
>
try quanta
krazy.
___
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit
I recently tried Aptana Studio editor. It was very fine, although i could
not comment on using it in real time projects.
regards,
Senthil
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 14-May-08, at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya wrote:
>
> Please let me know the alte
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
>
>
>
eclipse with PHP plugin
--
dear,
T.Shrinivasan
My experiences with Linux are here
http://goinggnu.wordpress.com
For Free and Open S
rearranging top post ...
On 14-May-08, at 10:00 PM, senthilraja P wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 14-May-08, at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya wrote:
Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
a text editor + knowledge
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> no editor is a substitute for knowledge of CSS, html and javascript. Learn
> that first. This is the GNU/Linux way.
>
I do not subscribe to this PoV because it is a flawed logic in the RAD
arena. The Q solicits an edi
Hello,
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Venkatraman S wrote:
> Also, i would be interested in knowing as to how this is the "GNU/Linux
> Way".
"The GNU/Linux Way" possibly refers to:
You should not limit your freedom to Freedom 0
(Recall: Freedom 0 refers to the freedom to use software.)
On 14-May-08, at 10:48 PM, Shrinivasan T wrote:
Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
eclipse with PHP plugin
learn CSS, html and javascript and use any text editor.
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/
__
>
>
>
> Do note(again) that my observation is purely targetted at RAD developers
> and
> not those who develop mission-critical or high performance programs - in
> the
> latter, each and every line of te the program matters, and genreally these
> are 'hand-coded'.
>
>
Are you against RAD model? I f
On 15-May-08, at 9:51 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
no editor is a substitute for knowledge of CSS, html and
javascript. Learn
that first. This is the GNU/Linux way.
I do not subscribe to this PoV because it is a
On 15-May-08, at 10:57 AM, senthilraja P wrote:
Do note(again) that my observation is purely targetted at RAD
developers
and
not those who develop mission-critical or high performance
programs - in
the
latter, each and every line of te the program matters, and
genreally these
are 'hand-
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> do you mean to say that there are two kinds of application development -
> Rapid and ordinary? Like tatkal and ordinary in railway bookings? RAD does
> not mean 'how quickly can I produce a page of css/html'. It mean
On 15-May-08, at 3:44 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
http://www.alistapart.com/
and check out how many of the authors of these articles use DW
Ahh you are not getting my point at all - pointing to some
website is
not the name of the game.
I am NOT against using a simple editor(instead of a
On 15-May-08, at 12:58 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
1. mock-up in photoshop (gimp for us)
Why you are doing this - effectively you should be
writing a C/ASM which generates an array of number corresponding to
the
pixel values and then store it as a file. Some of my freinds in the
monkeyland
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> check this out:
>
> http://www.alistapart.com/
>
> and check out how many of the authors of these articles use DW
>
>
Ahh you are not getting my point at all - pointing to some website is
not the name of the game.
On 11:09:39 May 15, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> do you mean to say that there are two kinds of application development -
> Rapid and ordinary? Like tatkal and ordinary in railway bookings? RAD does
> not mean 'how quickly can I produce a page of css/html'. It means how
> quickly can I get a bug
On 15:36:17 May 15, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> http://www.alistapart.com/
>
> and check out how many of the authors of these articles use DW
>
Basically you are being advised that there is really no alternative to
taking pains in life...
The corporate world and half baked techies are so full of
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aha - I am *not* against using IDEs. I use quanta on linux and textmate on
> mac for html. What I *am* against is using WYSIWYG editors for generating
> html/css. If I click on 'list' in quanta I get the framework for a
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> aha - I am *not* against using IDEs. I use quanta on linux and textmate on
> mac for html. What I *am* against is using WYSIWYG editors for generating
> html/css. If I click on 'list' in quanta I get the framework fo
>
> I prefer to create a bulleted list like this:
>
>
> {% for item in listitems %}
> item.name
> {% endfor %}
>
>
>
Hmm, that looks like Django. Come to think of it, why use a high level
framework like that. Why not write plain sql statements, write plain
html, write your own authentication sy
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
no editor is a substitute for knowledge of CSS, html and javascript.
Learn that first. This is the GNU/Linux way.
I believe the GNU/Linux way might be: do whatever you want, however you
want it as long as you stick to the rules and limitations imposed by the
licenses
On 15-May-08, at 10:20 PM, S.Ramaswamy wrote:
Hmm, that looks like Django. Come to think of it, why use a high level
framework like that. Why not write plain sql statements, write plain
html, write your own authentication system, implement users and
groups, etc and attempt to connect all of tha
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 15-May-08, at 10:20 PM, S.Ramaswamy wrote:
>
>> Hmm, that looks like Django. Come to think of it, why use a high level
>> framework like that. Why not write plain sql statements, write plain
>> html, write your ow
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> let me put this in one line:
> Do not trust anything that *generates* code. One should write all code
> oneself.
>
"NEVER GENERALIZE" -- generalization are evil!
Just curious - are you an ASM expert? Writing a webf
2008/5/15 Venkatraman S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As you wont be using compiler/interpreters to 'generate' code.
I thought you still need an assembler.
- Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Praveen A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/15 Venkatraman S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > As you wont be using compiler/interpreters to 'generate' code.
>
> I thought you still need an assembler.
>
Ah! Eternal Damnation.
but i think guys get the point; and hence ram
On 16-May-08, at 10:06 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
let me put this in one line:
Do not trust anything that *generates* code. One should write all
code
oneself.
"NEVER GENERALIZE" -- generalization are evil!
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What did i asked you? an alternative tool.
> but where did this thread is heading too.
> thank God I didn't turn up to these thread for the past couple of days.
>
> By the way the good thing is most of our work is done,
>
Hm...
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> >
> > Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
> >
>
This thread has effectively been hijacked. The
On 16-May-08, at 4:18 PM, Shuveb Hussain wrote:
asking for an alternative to DW. Taking into account what DW does,
if anyone
can suggest an alternate tool that helps create static web pages
visually,
it would have helped our man.
if you had checked the thread, you would have found suggest
" quanta plus " and "amaya" might help you
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ravi Jaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Please let me know the alternative for dreamweaver in GNU/Linux
>
>
> cheers
>
> Ravi Jaya
> ___
> To unsubscribe, email
Hi,
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The point is, that the nix philosophy being what it is, there are very
> often no tools that give an exact alternative to the proprietary tool.
The UNIX philosophy is several things. And several parts that mak
36 matches
Mail list logo
