On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Natarajan V wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2013 11:50 AM, "Arun Khan" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Natarajan V wrote:
>> >
>> > As I was telling Karthick during my session, you can never assume that
>> > your code is secure just because you are using some
On 1/10/13, Natarajan V wrote:
[snip]
> As I was telling Karthick during my session, you can never assume that
> your code is secure just because you are using some framework.
One of the reasons why I end up always 'inventing' my own framework
based on the job at hand - I do feel stupid doing thi
On Jan 10, 2013 11:50 AM, "Arun Khan" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Natarajan V wrote:
> >
> > As I was telling Karthick during my session, you can never assume that
> > your code is secure just because you are using some framework. You
> > should always do your home work, and what
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Natarajan V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A major security vulnerability found in RoR has forced a government
> website to close down. The vulnerability exists in ALL versions of RoR
> unless you upgraded in the last two days.
>
> Some Links:
> http://blog.phusion.nl/2013/01/0
Hi,
A major security vulnerability found in RoR has forced a government
website to close down. The vulnerability exists in ALL versions of RoR
unless you upgraded in the last two days.
Some Links:
http://blog.phusion.nl/2013/01/03/rails-sql-injection-vulnerability-hold-your-horses-here-are-the-fa
