Hi List,
We have a website http://foo.com at IP 172.16.1.1, and a context
http://foo.com/somelink where /somelink is at 172.16.1.2 different
server.
In otherwords user should always see website is at IP 172.16.1.1
(through DNS lookups etc) but when you run http://foo.com/somelink it is
running
Hi,
You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this:
1. create a host in your DNS like
somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2
2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where
http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com
Hope this helps...
Sanvir
Registered Linux
Sanvir Singh Jham wrote:
You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this:
1. create a host in your DNS like
somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2
2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where
http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com
something as simple as
[Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start with none
of this could have (legally) happened. I presume the SugarCRM
developers chose their own license for a reason, and they can't really
complain if someone uses their code under the terms of that same
license -- Raju]
From:
Dear friends,
People worldwide are casting there votes to
elect the New Seven Wonders of the world. Initially,
there will be short-listing for 21 monuments till
February and then the voting will continue and will be
announcing the New SevenWonders
of the World on January 1, 2006.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anuj == anuj agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anuj Dear friends, People worldwide are casting there votes to
Anuj elect the New Seven Wonders of the world. Initially, there
Anuj will be short-listing for 21 monuments till February and
Advisory: plain text password exposure
Original Release Date: 2004-12-09
URL: http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20041209-1.txt
0. References
http://www.sec-consult.com/index.php?id=118
1. Systems affected:
All KDE 3.2.x releases, KDE 3.3.0, KDE 3.3.1 and KDE 3.3.2.
2
At 2004-12-09 21:15:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start with none
of this could have (legally) happened.
Uh, why not?
-- ams
___
ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anuj agarwal wrote:
To bring this china wall to first position,
more than 50%of votes are cast from the home country
china. Unfortunately, the Taj is in the seventh
position because of only 1.9% of votes from Indians.
Because we are not trying to stuff the ballot box? Oh, right ...
--
ams == Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ams At 2004-12-09 21:15:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start
with none of this could have (legally) happened.
ams Uh, why not?
Hmm, you're right -- vTiger is FLOSS
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
I am not hoping to start a relgious war here but I was wondering how
strict should one enforce the idea of bottom or inline posting vs top
posting.
I understand the idea that we should have the complete context in place
but does that really
Sanvir Singh Jham wrote:
You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this:
1. create a host in your DNS like
somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2
2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where
http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com
But
hello there,
i can help you regarding this... but i want to know do you have access
to this box? i mean to say that can you sit infront of this box? at
least you have to change CDs and execute some other commands other
than installation commands.
regards
sibayan
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:23:02
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 08:49 +0530, Raj Shekhar wrote:
Raj Shekhar wrote:
http://www.thehindu.com/2004/12/08/stories/2004120805770100.htm
Amendment to Patents Act this month
And now a small explanation on why if your job is developing software,
you should be worried. Firstly have a
14 matches
Mail list logo
