On Sunday 06 Mar 2011, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> Raju Mathur said on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:19:41AM +0530,:
> > On Sunday 06 Mar 2011, A. Mani wrote:
> > > See http://lwn.net/Articles/430098/
> > >
> > > It is a GPL violation.
> >
> > Maybe I'm short-sighted, but I don't really see how it is
Harish Pillay said on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 12:20:17PM +0800,:
> have a read of this:
>
> http://press.redhat.com/2011/03/04/commitment-to-open/
Thanks; please tell Brian that RH enjoys tremendous support in teh
Free Software community, in spite of its self imposed limitation to
"Open Source".
Grrr... the original messages were not to the ilugd mailing list, were
they? It is frustrating to reply without getting the context.
Raju Mathur said on Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:19:41AM +0530,:
> On Sunday 06 Mar 2011, A. Mani wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:53 PM, satyaakam goswami
> wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Harish Pillay writes:
> have a read of this:
> http://press.redhat.com/2011/03/04/commitment-to-open/
Thanks for the link. So now that makes it official :).
I'd a similar experience Some years ago when I use to work on Gentoo Hardened,
hoping to p
have a read of this:
http://press.redhat.com/2011/03/04/commitment-to-open/
disclaimer: I work for Red Hat
--
Harish Pillay h.pil...@ieee.org gpg id: 746809E3
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/
On Sunday 06 Mar 2011, A. Mani wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:53 PM, satyaakam goswami
wrote:
> > The following has been an interesting read
> > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Ha
> > t-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html
>
> See http://lwn.net/Artic
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:53 PM, satyaakam goswami wrote:
> The following has been an interesting read
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html
>
See http://lwn.net/Articles/430098/
It is a GPL violation.
Best
A. Mani
