Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-30 Thread Anupam Jain
On Nov 30, 2007 1:22 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30-Nov-07, at 11:21 AM, मनीष wrote: afaik firefox on doze is far superior to firefox on linux or on mac, because doze is their primary target In what ways? I have been using both regularly since v1 but

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-30 Thread मनीष
However, do note that the Firefox that I use has been installed externally and from the repos (using apt-get / something). (Wops! we have gone off-topic ;) ) Puneet, have you tried disabling Greasemonkey and BetterGmail addons? -- Manish ___ ilugd

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-30 Thread Roshan
-- Roshan wrote: [big snip] However, do note that the Firefox that I use has been installed externally and *NOT* from the repos (using ^^^ -- http://www.gnu.org.in http://www.somaiya.edu/sksasc 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-30 Thread Roshan
--- Anupam Jain wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 1:22 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: On 30-Nov-07, at 11:21 AM, मनीष wrote: afaik firefox on doze is far superior to firefox on linux or on mac, because doze is their primary target In what ways? I have been using

[ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Puneet Lakhina
Hi, I am able to get my firefox 2.0.10 to crash, if I carry out a certain sequence of steps which I have documented here http://sahyog.blogspot.com/2007/11/firefox-20010-crashing.html If anybody can provide any clues as to why this happening, Im all ears. -- Puneet http://sahyog.blogspot.com/

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Sahil Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 12:52 AM, Puneet Lakhina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am able to get my firefox 2.0.10 to crash, if I carry out a certain sequence of steps which I have documented here http://sahyog.blogspot.com/2007/11/firefox-20010-crashing.html If anybody can provide any clues as to

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread मनीष
On Nov 30, 2007 9:04 AM, Puneet Lakhina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 1:04 AM, Sahil Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 12:52 AM, Puneet Lakhina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am able to get my firefox 2.0.10 to crash, if I carry out a certain sequence of

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread मनीष
On Nov 30, 2007 11:16 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30-Nov-07, at 11:00 AM, Surjo Das wrote: once you do this, you will feel really relieved and firefox will work even better.. On the other hand if the original poster is facing issues with firefox on vista,

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 30-Nov-07, at 11:00 AM, Surjo Das wrote: once you do this, you will feel really relieved and firefox will work even better.. On the other hand if the original poster is facing issues with firefox on vista, then he can try using IE 7 which comes built-in with the OS. This is of

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sahil Dave Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 1:05 AM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem On Nov 30, 2007 12:52 AM, Puneet Lakhina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Puneet Lakhina
On the other hand if the original poster is facing issues with firefox on vista, then he can try using IE 7 which comes built-in with the OS. This is of course a choice if he wants to stick with Vista. Using vista is an obligation, but giving up firefox isn't really a choice :-) im a little

Re: [ilugd] Firefox problem

2007-11-29 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 30-Nov-07, at 11:21 AM, मनीष wrote: afaik firefox on doze is far superior to firefox on linux or on mac, because doze is their primary target In what ways? I have been using both regularly since v1 but haven't noticed any differences in responsiveness or functionality (other than