--- On Wed, 8/4/09, Shantanu Goel shantanu.g...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shantanu Goel shantanu.g...@gmail.com
Subject: [ilugd] iptables + selective proxying of connections
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Date: Wednesday, 8 April, 2009, 1:16 AM
Hi
I need some help on iptables if anyone knows about it here.
I have a linux based router and 3 machines (A, B, C) that connect it
to access the internet. I need to selectively route a couple of these
machines through proxy server(s) while keeping the 3rd machine's
connection untouched. I am
Hi sg,
Which site you have given me its realy usefull through it i can solve my
problem but now i m putting my head in a new Issue..i have visited netfilter
site (
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-2.html)
but not able to connect the server for
Hi,
I have given this argu in my iptables..
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -s 0/0 -i eth1 --dport 21 -time --timestart 16:30
--timestop 16:35 --days Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri -j ACCEPT
but when i applyed it its giving the error ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /etc/init.d/iptables restart
Flushing firewall rules:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manish Popli on Tuesday 15 Nov 2005 16:57 wrote:
Hi,
I have given this argu in my iptables..
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -s 0/0 -i eth1 --dport 21 -time --timestart 16:30
--timestop 16:35 --days Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri -j ACCEPT
but when i applyed it
Hi All,
I want give access to my some users for some perticuler time let say in the
morning and in the evening.
on my linux server ..rite now they are able to access 24*7 which i dunno
want For that i want to schdule the IPtable
so it will autometicaly start and stop so that some perticuler users
--- Manish Popli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I want give access to my some users for some perticuler time let say
in the morning and in the evening.
on my linux server ..rite now they are able to access 24*7 which i
dunno want For that i want to schdule the IPtable
so it will
Hi Manish,
Take a look at shorewall. I'm sure it can do it for you.
HTH
Tom
Manish Popli wrote:
Hi All,
I want give access to my some users for some perticuler time let say in the
morning and in the evening.
on my linux server ..rite now they are able to access 24*7 which i dunno
want For
On 11/14/05, Tom Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manish,
Take a look at shorewall. I'm sure it can do it for you.
HTH
Tom
Manish Popli wrote:
Hi All,
I want give access to my some users for some perticuler time let say in the
morning and in the evening.
on my linux server ..rite
list ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ilugd] iptables problems
On 10/14/05, SWAPNIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
We are using Red Hat 9.0 as gateway server with Kernel 2.4.20-8 and
iptables
firewall
We are facing some problems
On 10/14/05, SWAPNIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
We are using Red Hat 9.0 as gateway server with Kernel 2.4.20-8 and iptables
firewall
We are facing some problems with network traffic. FTP is not working IP
phone is not working
hi swapnil,
check this rule in your nat/postrouting chain
Dear All,
We are using Red Hat 9.0 as gateway server with Kernel 2.4.20-8 and iptables
firewall
We are facing some problems with network traffic. FTP is not working IP
phone is not working
Please find network.pdf using following link for your reference.
Dear Sir,
We are using Red Hat 9.0 as gateway server with Kernel 2.4.20-8 and iptables
firewall
We are facing some problems with network traffic.
Please find network.pdf using following link for your reference.
http://downloadftp.modular-infotech.com/common/share/network.pdf
Thanks and regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't think it to be that simple and easy for you (or anyone else) to move
GPL code to Solaris.
rrs
Anand Kapoor on Friday 23 Sep 2005 23:17 wrote:
Hello,
Does anybody know the Solaris 10 equivalent (ipf) of the Linux iptables
QUEUE target
Hello,
Does anybody know the Solaris 10 equivalent (ipf) of the Linux iptables
QUEUE target .. i am specifically looking for something in IPF. IPFW
has something called divert which does similar stuff.
In detail what i am trying to do here is move an application from
Linux to Solaris:
The
Dear all,
Thanks for spending your valuable time for my problem.
My IPTABLES problem is solved.
RH 9.0 system is currently working as Mail, Proxy, DNS server and Router.
I can access my local webserver from any destination. And my network can
access any specified client from Internet cloud.
My
Dear All,
I have just install RH 9.0 as proxy server and mail server for our network
now i need implement iptables in my RH 9 system for using as router
before this i am using ipchains in RH 6.2
ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.1 -d www.mydomain.com -j MASQ
i want command for iptables with
using iptables. Also i would like to know how
to specify incomming routes using NS, I have global domainname with NS.
please help me
Swapnil K
- Original Message -
From: Debashis Sen
To: SWAPNIL
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [ilugd] iptables implementation
Command
--- SWAPNIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
I have just install RH 9.0 as proxy server and mail
server for our network
now i need implement iptables in my RH 9 system for
using as router
before this i am using ipchains in RH 6.2
ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.1 -d
Swapnil K.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Prashant Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SWAPNIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Linux-Delhi mailing
list ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ilugd] iptables implementation
--- SWAPNIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Create a passive connection with the FTP client. FTP uses random ports
for directory listing which is being blocked by your fw.
Regards,
Akshay Lamba
- Original Message -
From: Mani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, November 27, 2003 12:16 pm
Subject: [ilugd] IPTABLES-NAT FTP directory
I recently replaced a Netgear firewall/router with a RH 9 box running
IPTABLE's. I configured iptables for NAT/MASQ using webmin. The
configuration works perfectly fine except for one small problem; LAN users
are able to conntect to ftp server, but they cannot get a directory list
from the ftp
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 23:32, Robins Tharakan wrote:
sorry if i am very stupid but,
have you routed the packets correctly?
it might just be that your default packet route after restarting
iptables is eth1 rather than the original eth0.
the easiest way to find out is whether traceroute
Hi all,
I have a doubt. I have a PC running RH 9 with iptables set up. It has
two n/w cards. eth0 is connected to the internal network of the company
and gets its ip from the DHCP server which is also the name server etc
etc.eth1 is connected to a hub which forms my own small network running
its
sorry if i am very stupid but,
have you routed the packets correctly?
it might just be that your default packet route after restarting
iptables is eth1 rather than the original eth0.
the easiest way to find out is whether traceroute 12.12.12.12, or any
other ip address not on your eth0.
!hih!
i use
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
to allow my linux box to act as gateway for my local
windows system amd access internet.
it works fine.
how can i restrict the same thing for a specific
ipaddress(es) only.
expample my linux box should act as gateway only to
say
Amit,
i use
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
to allow my linux box to act as gateway for my local
windows system amd access internet.
it works fine.
how can i restrict the same thing for a specific
ipaddress(es) only.
expample my linux box should act as gateway
27 matches
Mail list logo
