Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2005-09-26 15:46:09 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Community license provides a free version of Community Server that
can easily be upgraded to a commercial license.
BTW, this seems like an entirely coincidental use of community. It's
not even clear to me
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2005-09-26 15:46:09 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ams wrote:
Now I'm confused.
I'm still confused. I'm afraid I'm finding your argument a bit difficult
to follow, and I'm not even quite sure whether you're being sarcastic or
not. Nevertheless:
with
Hi
This is regarding the digressed thread of Where is the Community and
the many different elements of disucssion.
Here are some replies
Ram wrote :
Call is social responsibility, call it a *request from the community*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Sounds more like dictating a social *duty*.
At 2005-09-26 15:46:09 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Community license provides a free version of Community Server that
can easily be upgraded to a commercial license.
BTW, this seems like an entirely coincidental use of community. It's
not even clear to me if this communityserver.org
At 2005-09-27 00:39:51 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, if you can convince them that it is a good idea for them to
participate more, and do more to promote freedom, that would be a good
thing. But that isn't a question of obligations. The community's role
is partly to create an
ams == Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ams [snip]
ams (I suspect you're not going to like this, but RMS has written
ams and said now and again that the Free in Free software is
ams derived from the same roots as free enterprise, and inspired
ams by the ideals
