Raj Mathur wrote:
[Cross-posted]
Don't know whether to laugh or cry when reading this! SunComm, who
make a copy protection mechanism for audio CDs, is suing a student who
has revealed how to bypass the copy protection mechanism: by the
complex process of holding down the Shift key when
If anything those guys should be thanking the kid for exposing such a
huge security hole.
Kinda stupid of those people to let something like this to remain in
their copy protection system.
Anuj
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anything those guys should be thanking the kid for exposing such a
huge security hole.
Kinda stupid of those people to let something like this to remain in
their copy protection system.
IMHO the users who use such a stupid copy protection system deserve what
they get. They clearly bought
IMHO the users who use such a stupid copy protection system deserve
what
they get. They clearly bought into marketing hype and definitely
didn't
verify properly if the claims are valid. It also looks like that this
system
won't work with newer versions of windows or on windows machines where
the
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anything those guys should be thanking the kid for exposing
such a huge security hole.
Kinda stupid of those people to let something like this to
remain in their copy protection system.
Ambar IMHO the users who use
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 14:50, Raj Mathur wrote:
OTOH, the sheer stupidity of the copy-protection mechanism developed
by SunComm is still moot :)
Good news. I just read in the dailyprincetonian that they are not suing
John Halderman. The reason the CEO gives is that he does not want to
stop
