On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
BSD, is also a 'UNIX' 'Look Alike' [to the extent that it has passed
most of, if not all of the validations to be called UNIX]
BSD stands for 'Berkley Standard Distribution'; the 'of Unix' was left
off because everyone knew that was
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Charles Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:48 AM, ./aal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:29 AM, KP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the talk about Windows' on Mac, has brought me to this question.
Can a person run Linux on an Intel Mac?
On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:16 PM, ./aal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Charles Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:48 AM, ./aal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:29 AM, KP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the talk about Windows' on Mac, has brought me to this
The 'Implication' being that you could swap the 'GNU' portions, and
still have operable systems. [Don't work that way.]
Your implication being that tool=use [not quite]
You can take a car from UK and swap it onto a US road. That does not
mean you also carry over the laws from the UK with
